Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMDX vs RNWBX
CEMDX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CEMDX vs RNWBX
CEMDX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMDX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMDX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. CEMDX (2.23B). CEMDX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CEMDX (1.81) vs RNWBX (0.41). CEMDX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CEMDX (14 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than CEMDX (1.46). CEMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMDX: RNWBX (250) vs CEMDX (1000). CEMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.33 vs. RNWBX (18.14). CEMDX return over 5 years is better than : 85.39 vs. RNWBX (9.30).
| CEMDX | RNWBX | CEMDX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.66 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.66 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.156 | 12.082 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.23B | 90.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.81 | 0.41 | 439% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.33 | 18.14 | 222% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.85 | 39.22 | 216% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.39 | 9.30 | 918% |
| Returns for 10 years | 176.22 | 97.97 | 180% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement