Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMDX vs RNWEX
CEMDX vs RNWEX Comparison
Open Charts CEMDX vs RNWEX
CEMDX vs RNWEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMDX vs. RNWEX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMDX is a Hold and RNWEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWEX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. CEMDX (2.23B). CEMDX pays higher dividends than RNWEX: CEMDX (1.81) vs RNWEX (0.97). CEMDX was incepted earlier than RNWEX: CEMDX (14 years) vs RNWEX (24 years). CEMDX (1.46) is less costly to investors than RNWEX (0.92). CEMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. RNWEX (46.00). RNWEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMDX: RNWEX (250) vs CEMDX (1000). CEMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.33 vs. RNWEX (19.27). CEMDX return over 5 years is better than : 85.39 vs. RNWEX (13.24).
| CEMDX | RNWEX | CEMDX / RNWEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.92 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.92 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.156 | 12.535 | 169% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.23B | 90.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.81 | 0.97 | 187% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.33 | 19.27 | 209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.85 | 42.88 | 198% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.39 | 13.24 | 645% |
| Returns for 10 years | 176.22 | 106.70 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement