Ad is loading...
CEMDX vs RNWFX
CEMDX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMDX vs RNWFX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div Retail
Price$12.78
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets990.93M
American Funds New World R5
Price$80.73
Change-$0.44 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.63B
CEMDX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMDX vs. RNWFX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMDX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 63.6B vs. CEMDX (991M). CEMDX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEMDX (3.81) vs RNWFX (1.51). CEMDX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMDX (12 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). CEMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RNWFX (32.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMDX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMDX (1000). CEMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.49 vs. RNWFX (5.10). CEMDX return over 5 years is better than : 44.74 vs. RNWFX (18.00).
| CEMDX | RNWFX | CEMDX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.486 | 4.491 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 991M | 63.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.81 | 1.51 | 253% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.49 | 5.10 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.85 | 6.30 | 379% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.74 | 18.00 | 249% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.99 | 50.70 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...