Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMDX vs RNWFX
CEMDX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMDX vs RNWFX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div Retail
Price$15.48
Change+$0.08 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
American Funds New World R5
Price$95.46
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.08B
CEMDX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMDX vs. RNWFX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMDX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. CEMDX (1.43B). CEMDX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEMDX (2.59) vs RNWFX (1.01). CEMDX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMDX (13 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). CEMDX (1.47) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMDX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMDX (1000). CEMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.09 vs. RNWFX (17.17). CEMDX return over 5 years is better than : 86.60 vs. RNWFX (32.52).
| CEMDX | RNWFX | CEMDX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.62 | 202% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.62 | 237% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.281 | 23.557 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 74.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.59 | 1.01 | 256% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.09 | 17.17 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.59 | 50.26 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.60 | 32.52 | 266% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.41 | 98.91 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement