Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMDX vs RNWFX
CEMDX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMDX vs RNWFX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div Retail
Price$14.17
Change+$0.06 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
American Funds New World R5
Price$89.84
Change+$0.23 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.13B
CEMDX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMDX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMDX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 70.1B vs. CEMDX (1.3B). CEMDX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEMDX (2.71) vs RNWFX (1.04). CEMDX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMDX (13 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). CEMDX (1.47) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMDX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMDX (1000). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.55 vs. CEMDX (10.48). CEMDX return over 5 years is better than : 81.38 vs. RNWFX (29.89).
| CEMDX | RNWFX | CEMDX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.62 | 202% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.62 | 237% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.355 | 16.283 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.3B | 70.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 1.04 | 262% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.48 | 11.55 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.05 | 41.57 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.38 | 29.89 | 272% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.00 | 68.59 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement