Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
CEMDX vs RNWFX
CEMDX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMDX vs RNWFX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div Retail
Price$12.47
Change-$0.07 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds New World R5
Price$80.56
Change-$0.79 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
CEMDX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMDX vs. RNWFX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMDX is a Sell and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 60.9B vs. CEMDX (918M). CEMDX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEMDX (3.81) vs RNWFX (1.51). CEMDX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMDX (12 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). CEMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RNWFX (32.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMDX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMDX (1000). CEMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.22 vs. RNWFX (11.54). CEMDX return over 5 years is better than : 44.95 vs. RNWFX (17.17).
| CEMDX | RNWFX | CEMDX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.329 | 7.099 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 918M | 60.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.81 | 1.51 | 253% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.22 | 11.54 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.54 | -14.55 | -127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.95 | 17.17 | 262% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.78 | 41.00 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...