Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMDX vs RNWFX
CEMDX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMDX vs RNWFX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div Retail
Price$14.53
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.35B
American Funds New World R5
Price$90.27
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.59B
CEMDX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMDX vs. RNWFX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMDX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. CEMDX (1.35B). CEMDX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEMDX (2.66) vs RNWFX (1.04). CEMDX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMDX (13 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). CEMDX (1.47) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMDX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMDX (1000). CEMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.18 vs. RNWFX (16.22). CEMDX return over 5 years is better than : 78.82 vs. RNWFX (26.71).
| CEMDX | RNWFX | CEMDX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.62 | 202% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.62 | 237% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.260 | 16.839 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.35B | 70.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.66 | 1.04 | 255% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.18 | 16.22 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.40 | 34.79 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.82 | 26.71 | 295% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.30 | 74.60 | 141% |