Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMDX vs RNWFX
CEMDX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMDX vs RNWFX
CEMDX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMDX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMDX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. CEMDX (2.3B). CEMDX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEMDX (1.48) vs RNWFX (1.20). CEMDX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMDX (14 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). CEMDX (1.46) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMDX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMDX (1000). CEMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 52.44 vs. RNWFX (31.39). CEMDX return over 5 years is better than : 92.47 vs. RNWFX (20.98).
| CEMDX | RNWFX | CEMDX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.62 | 202% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.62 | 235% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.505 | 18.794 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.3B | 90.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 1.20 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 52.44 | 31.39 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.76 | 58.06 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.47 | 20.98 | 441% |
| Returns for 10 years | 205.66 | 135.60 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement