Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMDX vs RNWHX
CEMDX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CEMDX vs RNWHX
CEMDX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMDX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMDX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. CEMDX (2.3B). CEMDX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: CEMDX (1.48) vs RNWHX (1.15). CEMDX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CEMDX (14 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). CEMDX (1.46) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). CEMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMDX: RNWHX (250) vs CEMDX (1000). CEMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 52.44 vs. RNWHX (31.15). CEMDX return over 5 years is better than : 92.47 vs. RNWHX (20.21).
| CEMDX | RNWHX | CEMDX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.72 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.72 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.505 | 18.743 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.3B | 90.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 1.15 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 52.44 | 31.15 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.76 | 57.37 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.47 | 20.21 | 457% |
| Returns for 10 years | 205.66 | 132.48 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement