Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMDX vs RNWHX
CEMDX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CEMDX vs RNWHX
CEMDX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMDX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMDX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. CEMDX (2.23B). CEMDX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: CEMDX (1.81) vs RNWHX (1.14). CEMDX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CEMDX (14 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). CEMDX (1.46) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). CEMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMDX: RNWHX (250) vs CEMDX (1000). CEMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.33 vs. RNWHX (19.47). CEMDX return over 5 years is better than : 85.39 vs. RNWHX (14.04).
| CEMDX | RNWHX | CEMDX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.72 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.72 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.156 | 12.651 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.23B | 90.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.81 | 1.14 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.33 | 19.47 | 207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.85 | 43.67 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.39 | 14.04 | 608% |
| Returns for 10 years | 176.22 | 107.31 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers