Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMFX vs RNWFX
CEMFX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMFX vs RNWFX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div I
Price$14.13
Change-$0.13 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
American Funds New World R5
Price$89.27
Change-$0.78 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.56B
CEMFX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMFX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMFX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. CEMFX (1.18B). CEMFX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEMFX (2.91) vs RNWFX (1.04). CEMFX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMFX (13 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). CEMFX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMFX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMFX (1000000). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.00 vs. CEMFX (9.40). CEMFX return over 5 years is better than : 78.15 vs. RNWFX (28.58).
| CEMFX | RNWFX | CEMFX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.62 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.62 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.068 | 15.545 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 70.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 1.04 | 281% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.40 | 10.00 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.25 | 37.72 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.15 | 28.58 | 273% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.48 | 69.70 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement