Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
CEMFX vs RNWFX
CEMFX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMFX vs RNWFX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div I
Price$12.62
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds New World R5
Price$81.19
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
CEMFX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMFX vs. RNWFX commentary
Nov 22, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMFX is a Sell and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 61.7B vs. CEMFX (930M). CEMFX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEMFX (3.92) vs RNWFX (1.51). CEMFX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMFX (12 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). CEMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RNWFX (32.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMFX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMFX (1000000). CEMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.70 vs. RNWFX (11.63). CEMFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.26 vs. RNWFX (18.28).
| CEMFX | RNWFX | CEMFX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.812 | 7.937 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 930M | 61.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.92 | 1.51 | 260% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.70 | 11.63 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.91 | -11.11 | -197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.26 | 18.28 | 259% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.83 | 40.78 | 157% |