Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMFX vs RNWFX
CEMFX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMFX vs RNWFX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div I
Price$15.65
Change+$0.09 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
American Funds New World R5
Price$95.46
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.08B
CEMFX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMFX vs. RNWFX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMFX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. CEMFX (1.43B). CEMFX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEMFX (2.78) vs RNWFX (1.01). CEMFX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMFX (13 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). CEMFX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMFX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMFX (1000000). CEMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.36 vs. RNWFX (17.17). CEMFX return over 5 years is better than : 88.78 vs. RNWFX (32.52).
| CEMFX | RNWFX | CEMFX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.62 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.62 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.511 | 23.557 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 74.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.78 | 1.01 | 274% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.36 | 17.17 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.77 | 50.26 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 88.78 | 32.52 | 273% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.53 | 98.91 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement