Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMFX vs RNWFX
CEMFX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMFX vs RNWFX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div I
Price$13.63
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
American Funds New World R5
Price$86.46
Change+$0.19 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.63B
CEMFX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMFX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMFX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 67.6B vs. CEMFX (1.12B). CEMFX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEMFX (3.25) vs RNWFX (1.09). CEMFX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMFX (13 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). CEMFX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMFX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMFX (1000000). CEMFX (8.18) and RNWFX (7.83) have marching annual gain over last year. CEMFX return over 5 years is better than : 75.76 vs. RNWFX (30.81).
| CEMFX | RNWFX | CEMFX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.62 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.62 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.439 | 11.908 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 67.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.25 | 1.09 | 298% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.18 | 7.83 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.39 | 23.90 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.76 | 30.81 | 246% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.21 | 63.49 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers