Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMFX vs RNWFX
CEMFX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMFX vs RNWFX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div I
Price$14.68
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.35B
American Funds New World R5
Price$90.27
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.58B
CEMFX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMFX vs. RNWFX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMFX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. CEMFX (1.35B). CEMFX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEMFX (2.86) vs RNWFX (1.04). CEMFX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMFX (13 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). CEMFX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMFX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMFX (1000000). CEMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.41 vs. RNWFX (16.22). CEMFX return over 5 years is better than : 81.06 vs. RNWFX (26.71).
| CEMFX | RNWFX | CEMFX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.62 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.62 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.469 | 16.839 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.35B | 70.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.86 | 1.04 | 274% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.41 | 16.22 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.51 | 34.79 | 185% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.06 | 26.71 | 303% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.77 | 74.60 | 148% |