Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMFX vs RNWFX
CEMFX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMFX vs RNWFX
CEMFX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMFX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMFX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. CEMFX (2.3B). CEMFX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEMFX (1.71) vs RNWFX (1.20). CEMFX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMFX (14 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). CEMFX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMFX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMFX (1000000). CEMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 52.64 vs. RNWFX (31.39). CEMFX return over 5 years is better than : 94.86 vs. RNWFX (20.98).
| CEMFX | RNWFX | CEMFX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.62 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.62 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.583 | 18.794 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.3B | 90.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 1.20 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 52.64 | 31.39 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 101.95 | 58.06 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.86 | 20.98 | 452% |
| Returns for 10 years | 213.02 | 135.60 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement