Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMGX vs FNWFX
CEMGX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMGX vs FNWFX
CEMGX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMGX vs. FNWFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMGX is a Hold and FNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. CEMGX (2.23B). FNWFX pays higher dividends than CEMGX: FNWFX (1.24) vs CEMGX (1.16). CEMGX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: CEMGX (14 years) vs FNWFX (9 years). CEMGX (2.21) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). CEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. FNWFX (46.00). CEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: CEMGX (1000) vs FNWFX (1000000). CEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.15 vs. FNWFX (19.73). CEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 78.60 vs. FNWFX (14.94).
| CEMGX | FNWFX | CEMGX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.57 | 351% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 0.57 | 388% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.601 | 12.743 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.23B | 90.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.24 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.15 | 19.73 | 198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.47 | 44.48 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.60 | 14.94 | 526% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.37 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement