Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMGX vs RNWFX
CEMGX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMGX vs RNWFX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div C
Price$14.43
Change+$0.17 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
American Funds New World R5
Price$92.01
Change+$0.67 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.9B
CEMGX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMGX vs. RNWFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMGX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 71.9B vs. CEMGX (1.39B). CEMGX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEMGX (2.04) vs RNWFX (1.01). CEMGX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMGX (13 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). CEMGX (2.22) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMGX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMGX (1000). CEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.10 vs. RNWFX (15.41). CEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 75.13 vs. RNWFX (26.72).
| CEMGX | RNWFX | CEMGX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.62 | 323% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.22 | 0.62 | 358% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.318 | 19.091 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 71.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.04 | 1.01 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.10 | 15.41 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.13 | 43.73 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.13 | 26.72 | 281% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.38 | 93.12 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement