Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMGX vs RNWFX
CEMGX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMGX vs RNWFX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div C
Price$13.19
Change-$0.06 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
American Funds New World R5
Price$85.78
Change-$0.49 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.64B
CEMGX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMGX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jun 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMGX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 67.6B vs. CEMGX (1.12B). CEMGX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEMGX (2.47) vs RNWFX (1.09). CEMGX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMGX (13 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). CEMGX (2.22) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMGX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMGX (1000). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.97 vs. CEMGX (5.04). CEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 68.42 vs. RNWFX (30.20).
| CEMGX | RNWFX | CEMGX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.62 | 323% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.22 | 0.62 | 358% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.761 | 11.028 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 67.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.47 | 1.09 | 226% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.04 | 6.97 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.78 | 33.43 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.42 | 30.20 | 227% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.08 | 57.53 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers