Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMGX vs RNWFX
CEMGX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMGX vs RNWFX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div C
Price$14.10
Change-$0.07 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.33B
American Funds New World R5
Price$90.52
Change-$0.42 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.79B
CEMGX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMGX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMGX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 70.8B vs. CEMGX (1.33B). CEMGX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEMGX (2.14) vs RNWFX (1.04). CEMGX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMGX (13 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). CEMGX (2.22) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMGX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMGX (1000). RNWFX (16.21) and CEMGX (16.03) have marching annual gain over last year. CEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 75.78 vs. RNWFX (30.24).
| CEMGX | RNWFX | CEMGX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.62 | 323% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.22 | 0.62 | 358% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.612 | 17.163 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.33B | 70.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.14 | 1.04 | 207% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.03 | 16.21 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.75 | 40.68 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.78 | 30.24 | 251% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.10 | 74.70 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement