Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMGX vs RNWFX
CEMGX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMGX vs RNWFX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div C
Price$15.37
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
American Funds New World R5
Price$96.31
Change-$0.31 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
CEMGX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMGX vs. RNWFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMGX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. CEMGX (1.48B). CEMGX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEMGX (1.36) vs RNWFX (0.97). CEMGX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMGX (13 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). CEMGX (2.22) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMGX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMGX (1000). CEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.30 vs. RNWFX (12.79). CEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 85.08 vs. RNWFX (30.85).
| CEMGX | RNWFX | CEMGX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.62 | 323% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.22 | 0.62 | 358% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.524 | 24.657 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 75.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.97 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.30 | 12.79 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 87.00 | 57.93 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.08 | 30.85 | 276% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.04 | 95.27 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement