Ad is loading...
CEMGX vs RNWFX
CEMGX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMGX vs RNWFX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div C
Price$12.53
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets991.52M
American Funds New World R5
Price$80.73
Change-$0.44 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.98B
CEMGX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMGX vs. RNWFX commentary
Feb 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMGX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 64B vs. CEMGX (992M). CEMGX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEMGX (3.38) vs RNWFX (1.51). CEMGX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMGX (12 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). CEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RNWFX (32.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMGX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMGX (1000). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.18 vs. CEMGX (5.69). CEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 39.66 vs. RNWFX (18.70).
| CEMGX | RNWFX | CEMGX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.533 | 5.113 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 992M | 64B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.38 | 1.51 | 224% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.69 | 7.18 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.66 | 5.35 | 367% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.66 | 18.70 | 212% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.70 | 52.12 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers