Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMGX vs RNWFX
CEMGX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMGX vs RNWFX
CEMGX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMGX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMGX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. CEMGX (2.3B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than CEMGX: RNWFX (1.20) vs CEMGX (0.90). CEMGX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMGX (14 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). CEMGX (2.21) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMGX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMGX (1000). CEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.15 vs. RNWFX (31.39). CEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 85.41 vs. RNWFX (20.98).
| CEMGX | RNWFX | CEMGX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.62 | 323% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 0.62 | 356% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.038 | 18.794 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.3B | 90.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.20 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 51.15 | 31.39 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 96.14 | 58.06 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.41 | 20.98 | 407% |
| Returns for 10 years | 183.56 | 135.60 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement