Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMGX vs RNWFX
CEMGX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMGX vs RNWFX
CEMGX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMGX vs. RNWFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMGX is a Hold and RNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. CEMGX (2.39B). RNWFX (1.22) and CEMGX (1.18) have matching dividends . CEMGX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMGX (14 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). CEMGX (2.21) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMGX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMGX (1000). CEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.78 vs. RNWFX (22.59). CEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 91.26 vs. RNWFX (23.78).
| CEMGX | RNWFX | CEMGX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.62 | 323% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 0.62 | 356% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.599 | 17.094 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.39B | 88.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 1.22 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.78 | 22.59 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 92.70 | 56.61 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.26 | 23.78 | 384% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.53 | 111.30 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers