Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMGX vs RNWHX
CEMGX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CEMGX vs RNWHX
CEMGX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMGX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMGX is a Hold and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. CEMGX (2.39B). CEMGX (1.18) and RNWHX (1.17) have matching dividends . CEMGX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CEMGX (14 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). CEMGX (2.21) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). CEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMGX: RNWHX (250) vs CEMGX (1000). CEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.78 vs. RNWHX (22.38). CEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 91.26 vs. RNWHX (22.98).
| CEMGX | RNWHX | CEMGX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.72 | 278% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 0.72 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.599 | 17.024 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.39B | 88.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 1.17 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.78 | 22.38 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 92.70 | 55.91 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.26 | 22.98 | 397% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.53 | 108.52 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers