Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMGX vs RNWHX
CEMGX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CEMGX vs RNWHX
CEMGX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMGX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMGX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. CEMGX (2.23B). CEMGX (1.16) and RNWHX (1.14) have matching dividends . CEMGX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CEMGX (14 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). CEMGX (2.21) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). CEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMGX: RNWHX (250) vs CEMGX (1000). CEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.15 vs. RNWHX (19.47). CEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 78.60 vs. RNWHX (14.04).
| CEMGX | RNWHX | CEMGX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.72 | 278% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 0.72 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.601 | 12.651 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.23B | 90.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.14 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.15 | 19.47 | 201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.47 | 43.67 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.60 | 14.04 | 560% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.37 | 107.31 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers