Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMGX vs RNWHX
CEMGX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CEMGX vs RNWHX
CEMGX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMGX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMGX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. CEMGX (2.47B). RNWHX (1.15) and CEMGX (1.13) have matching dividends . CEMGX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CEMGX (14 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). CEMGX (2.21) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). CEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMGX: RNWHX (250) vs CEMGX (1000). CEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.44 vs. RNWHX (17.19). CEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 87.45 vs. RNWHX (17.68).
| CEMGX | RNWHX | CEMGX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.72 | 278% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 0.72 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.321 | 16.447 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.47B | 90B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.15 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.44 | 17.19 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.40 | 53.84 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 87.45 | 17.68 | 495% |
| Returns for 10 years | 162.57 | 111.44 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers