Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMIX vs RNWAX
CEMIX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts CEMIX vs RNWAX
CEMIX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMIX vs. RNWAX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMIX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. CEMIX (3.88B). CEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: CEMIX (0.93) vs RNWAX (0.49). CEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: CEMIX (19 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than CEMIX (1.09). CEMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. RNWAX (46.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMIX: RNWAX (250) vs CEMIX (1000000). CEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.65 vs. RNWAX (14.32). CEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 32.21 vs. RNWAX (8.13).
| CEMIX | RNWAX | CEMIX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.66 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.66 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.176 | 10.342 | 205% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.88B | 90.7B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.49 | 192% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.65 | 14.32 | 249% |
| Returns for 3 years | 91.26 | 36.49 | 250% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.21 | 8.13 | 396% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.54 | 93.91 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers