Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMIX vs RNWAX
CEMIX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts CEMIX vs RNWAX
CEMIX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMIX vs. RNWAX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMIX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. CEMIX (4.13B). CEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: CEMIX (0.93) vs RNWAX (0.49). CEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: CEMIX (19 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than CEMIX (1.09). CEMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. RNWAX (46.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMIX: RNWAX (250) vs CEMIX (1000000). CEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.00 vs. RNWAX (22.33). CEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 37.01 vs. RNWAX (10.53).
| CEMIX | RNWAX | CEMIX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.66 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.66 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.519 | 13.677 | 223% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.13B | 90.9B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.49 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.00 | 22.33 | 246% |
| Returns for 3 years | 113.85 | 45.13 | 252% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.01 | 10.53 | 351% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.41 | 111.86 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers