Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMIX vs RNWBX
CEMIX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CEMIX vs RNWBX
CEMIX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMIX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMIX is a Hold and RNWBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. CEMIX (4.1B). CEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CEMIX (0.94) vs RNWBX (0.41). CEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CEMIX (19 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than CEMIX (1.09). CEMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMIX: RNWBX (250) vs CEMIX (1000000). CEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.69 vs. RNWBX (19.81). CEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 40.94 vs. RNWBX (11.95).
| CEMIX | RNWBX | CEMIX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.66 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.66 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.343 | 16.015 | 183% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.1B | 88.6B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 0.41 | 226% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.69 | 19.81 | 221% |
| Returns for 3 years | 111.06 | 48.77 | 228% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.94 | 11.95 | 342% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.05 | 96.44 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement