Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMIX vs RNWFX
CEMIX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMIX vs RNWFX
CEMIX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMIX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMIX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. CEMIX (4.13B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than CEMIX: RNWFX (1.20) vs CEMIX (0.93). CEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMIX (19 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). CEMIX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMIX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMIX (1000000). CEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.00 vs. RNWFX (23.90). CEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 37.01 vs. RNWFX (16.08).
| CEMIX | RNWFX | CEMIX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.62 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.62 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.519 | 14.186 | 215% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.13B | 90.9B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.20 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.00 | 23.90 | 230% |
| Returns for 3 years | 113.85 | 50.35 | 226% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.01 | 16.08 | 230% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.41 | 124.88 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers