Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMIX vs RNWFX
CEMIX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMIX vs RNWFX
CEMIX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMIX vs. RNWFX commentary
Sep 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMIX is a Hold and RNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. CEMIX (4.1B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than CEMIX: RNWFX (1.20) vs CEMIX (0.94). CEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMIX (19 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). CEMIX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMIX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMIX (1000000). CEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.69 vs. RNWFX (21.36). CEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 40.94 vs. RNWFX (17.57).
| CEMIX | RNWFX | CEMIX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.62 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.62 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.343 | 16.838 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.1B | 88.6B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.20 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.69 | 21.36 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 111.06 | 54.19 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.94 | 17.57 | 233% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.05 | 108.43 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement