Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMIX vs RNWHX
CEMIX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CEMIX vs RNWHX
CEMIX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMIX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMIX is a Hold and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. CEMIX (4.1B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than CEMIX: RNWHX (1.15) vs CEMIX (0.94). CEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CEMIX (19 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). CEMIX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). CEMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMIX: RNWHX (250) vs CEMIX (1000000). CEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.69 vs. RNWHX (21.15). CEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 40.94 vs. RNWHX (16.82).
| CEMIX | RNWHX | CEMIX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.72 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.72 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.343 | 16.774 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.1B | 88.6B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.15 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.69 | 21.15 | 207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 111.06 | 53.53 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.94 | 16.82 | 243% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.05 | 105.73 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement