Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMIX vs RNWHX
CEMIX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CEMIX vs RNWHX
CEMIX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMIX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMIX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. CEMIX (4.13B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than CEMIX: RNWHX (1.15) vs CEMIX (0.93). CEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CEMIX (19 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). CEMIX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). CEMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMIX: RNWHX (250) vs CEMIX (1000000). CEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.00 vs. RNWHX (23.68). CEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 37.01 vs. RNWHX (15.35).
| CEMIX | RNWHX | CEMIX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.72 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.72 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.519 | 14.152 | 216% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.13B | 90.9B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.15 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.00 | 23.68 | 232% |
| Returns for 3 years | 113.85 | 49.71 | 229% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.01 | 15.35 | 241% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.41 | 121.91 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement