Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMVX vs RNWAX
CEMVX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts CEMVX vs RNWAX
CEMVX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMVX vs. RNWAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMVX is a Hold and RNWAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. CEMVX (4.14B). CEMVX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: CEMVX (0.83) vs RNWAX (0.50). CEMVX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: CEMVX (19 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than CEMVX (1.34). CEMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. RNWAX (46.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMVX: RNWAX (250) vs CEMVX (5000). CEMVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.92 vs. RNWAX (21.05). CEMVX return over 5 years is better than : 51.43 vs. RNWAX (17.88).
| CEMVX | RNWAX | CEMVX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.66 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.66 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.544 | 16.336 | 181% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 4000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.14B | 88.6B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 0.50 | 167% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.92 | 21.05 | 209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 115.45 | 51.16 | 226% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.43 | 17.88 | 288% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.31 | 99.11 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers