Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMVX vs RNWBX
CEMVX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CEMVX vs RNWBX
Causeway Emerging Markets Investor
Price$14.40
Change-$0.13 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.73B
American Funds New World R2
Price$91.33
Change-$0.26 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.4B
CEMVX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMVX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMVX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.4B vs. CEMVX (2.73B). CEMVX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CEMVX (2.70) vs RNWBX (0.12). CEMVX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CEMVX (19 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than CEMVX (1.39). CEMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMVX: RNWBX (250) vs CEMVX (5000). CEMVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.18 vs. RNWBX (13.28). CEMVX return over 5 years is better than : 27.23 vs. RNWBX (24.59).
| CEMVX | RNWBX | CEMVX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.67 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.67 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.374 | 24.174 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 4000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.73B | 75.4B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 0.12 | 2,237% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.18 | 13.28 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.95 | 56.69 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.23 | 24.59 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.50 | 87.09 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers