Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMVX vs RNWBX
CEMVX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CEMVX vs RNWBX
Causeway Emerging Markets Investor
Price$13.29
Change+$0.13 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.44B
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.41
Change+$0.71 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.98B
CEMVX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMVX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMVX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70B vs. CEMVX (2.44B). CEMVX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CEMVX (2.93) vs RNWBX (0.13). CEMVX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CEMVX (18 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than CEMVX (1.39). CEMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMVX: RNWBX (250) vs CEMVX (5000). CEMVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.51 vs. RNWBX (17.48). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 21.46 vs. CEMVX (18.69).
| CEMVX | RNWBX | CEMVX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.67 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.67 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.987 | 16.125 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 4000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.44B | 70B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 0.13 | 2,271% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.51 | 17.48 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.39 | 30.84 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.69 | 21.46 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.91 | 64.57 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers