Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMVX vs RNWBX
CEMVX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CEMVX vs RNWBX
Causeway Emerging Markets Investor
Price$13.46
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.52B
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.70
Change+$0.31 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
CEMVX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMVX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMVX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. CEMVX (2.53B). CEMVX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CEMVX (2.93) vs RNWBX (0.13). CEMVX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CEMVX (18 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than CEMVX (1.39). CEMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMVX: RNWBX (250) vs CEMVX (5000). CEMVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.54 vs. RNWBX (11.99). CEMVX (18.48) and RNWBX (18.24) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CEMVX | RNWBX | CEMVX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.67 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.67 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.609 | 17.879 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 4000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.53B | 71.8B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 0.13 | 2,271% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.54 | 11.99 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.79 | 36.12 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.48 | 18.24 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.92 | 81.10 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement