Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMVX vs RNWBX
CEMVX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CEMVX vs RNWBX
CEMVX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMVX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMVX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. CEMVX (4.29B). CEMVX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CEMVX (0.77) vs RNWBX (0.41). CEMVX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CEMVX (19 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than CEMVX (1.34). CEMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMVX: RNWBX (250) vs CEMVX (5000). CEMVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 67.14 vs. RNWBX (28.07). CEMVX return over 5 years is better than : 40.72 vs. RNWBX (14.29).
| CEMVX | RNWBX | CEMVX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.66 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.66 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.126 | 16.252 | 216% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 4000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.29B | 85.6B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 0.41 | 186% |
| Returns for 1 year | 67.14 | 28.07 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | 128.04 | 51.49 | 249% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.72 | 14.29 | 285% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.63 | 111.19 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement