Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMVX vs RNWBX
CEMVX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CEMVX vs RNWBX
CEMVX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMVX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMVX is a Hold and RNWBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. CEMVX (4.13B). CEMVX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CEMVX (0.78) vs RNWBX (0.41). CEMVX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CEMVX (19 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than CEMVX (1.34). CEMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMVX: RNWBX (250) vs CEMVX (5000). CEMVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.45 vs. RNWBX (15.89). CEMVX return over 5 years is better than : 42.51 vs. RNWBX (12.78).
| CEMVX | RNWBX | CEMVX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.66 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.66 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.293 | 15.677 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 4000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.13B | 90B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.41 | 188% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.45 | 15.89 | 236% |
| Returns for 3 years | 113.38 | 49.10 | 231% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.51 | 12.78 | 333% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.96 | 101.87 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers