Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMVX vs RNWFX
CEMVX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMVX vs RNWFX
CEMVX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMVX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMVX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. CEMVX (4.34B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than CEMVX: RNWFX (1.20) vs CEMVX (0.77). CEMVX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMVX (19 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). CEMVX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMVX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMVX (5000). CEMVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 63.33 vs. RNWFX (31.39). CEMVX return over 5 years is better than : 44.09 vs. RNWFX (20.98).
| CEMVX | RNWFX | CEMVX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.62 | 216% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.62 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.011 | 18.794 | 192% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 4000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.34B | 90.9B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.20 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 63.33 | 31.39 | 202% |
| Returns for 3 years | 125.04 | 58.06 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.09 | 20.98 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.51 | 135.60 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement