Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMVX vs RNWHX
CEMVX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CEMVX vs RNWHX
CEMVX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMVX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMVX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. CEMVX (4.34B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than CEMVX: RNWHX (1.15) vs CEMVX (0.77). CEMVX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CEMVX (19 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). CEMVX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). CEMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMVX: RNWHX (250) vs CEMVX (5000). CEMVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 63.33 vs. RNWHX (31.15). CEMVX return over 5 years is better than : 44.09 vs. RNWHX (20.21).
| CEMVX | RNWHX | CEMVX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.72 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.72 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.011 | 18.743 | 192% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 4000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.34B | 90.9B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.15 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 63.33 | 31.15 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 125.04 | 57.37 | 218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.09 | 20.21 | 218% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.51 | 132.48 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement