CEPT
Price
$10.65
Change
+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:04 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
325.37M
51 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GSHR
Price
$10.41
Change
+$0.01 (+0.10%)
Updated
Jun 22 closing price
Capitalization
212.93M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CEPT vs GSHR

CEPT vs GSHR Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CEPT vs. GSHR commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEPT is a StrongBuy and GSHR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (CEPT: $10.64 vs. GSHR: $10.41)
Brand notoriety: CEPT and GSHR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CEPT: 277% vs. GSHR: 21%
Market capitalization -- CEPT: $325.37M vs. GSHR: $212.93M
CEPT [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $325.37M. GSHR’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $212.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $267.7M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CEPT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGSHR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CEPT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GSHR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CEPT and GSHR are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CEPT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSHR’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CEPT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GSHR’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CEPT is a better buy in the short-term than GSHR.

Price Growth

CEPT (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -10.81% price change this week, while GSHR (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

CEPT is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.12% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEPT($325M) has a higher market cap than GSHR($213M). CEPT has higher P/E ratio than GSHR: CEPT (131.54) vs GSHR (43.38). GSHR YTD gains are higher at: 1.391 vs. CEPT (-5.506). GSHR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.4M vs. CEPT (-3.31M). GSHR has more cash in the bank: 589K vs. CEPT (25K). CEPT (0) and GSHR (0) have equivalent revenues.
CEPTGSHRCEPT / GSHR
Capitalization325M213M153%
EBITDA-3.31M-1.4M236%
Gain YTD-5.5061.391-396%
P/E Ratio131.5443.38303%
Revenue00-
Total Cash25K589K4%
Total Debt605KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CEPTGSHR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
6%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CEPT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GSHR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MEMGX51.52N/A
N/A
MFS Emerging Markets Equity R3
LCMRX40.61N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Mid Cap Growth R
SCRZX13.81N/A
N/A
AB Small Cap Core Z
INSLX35.90N/A
N/A
Invesco International Small-Mid Com R5
LYFCX16.34N/A
N/A
AlphaCentric Life Sciences & Hlthcare C

CEPT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CEPT and LEGT have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CEPT and LEGT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CEPT
1D Price
Change %
CEPT100%
-4.23%
LEGT - CEPT
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGCTU - CEPT
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NHICU - CEPT
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TVAIU - CEPT
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NHIC - CEPT
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
More

GSHR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSHR and LWAC have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSHR and LWAC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSHR
1D Price
Change %
GSHR100%
+0.10%
LWAC - GSHR
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RAAQ - GSHR
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
LCCCU - GSHR
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTACU - GSHR
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
CEPT - GSHR
8%
Poorly correlated
-4.23%
More