CERS
Price
$2.57
Change
-$0.03 (-1.15%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
515.95M
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SENS
Price
$6.03
Change
-$0.33 (-5.19%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
314.52M
44 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CERS vs SENS

CERS vs SENS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CERS vs. SENS commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CERS is a StrongBuy and SENS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (CERS: $2.58 vs. SENS: $6.03)
Brand notoriety: CERS and SENS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CERS: 99% vs. SENS: 64%
Market capitalization -- CERS: $515.95M vs. SENS: $314.52M
CERS [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $515.95M. SENS’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $314.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $157.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CERS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSENS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CERS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SENS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SENS is a better buy in the long-term than CERS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CERS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SENS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CERS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SENS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SENS is a better buy in the short-term than CERS.

Price Growth

CERS (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +4.25% price change this week, while SENS (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -16.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

CERS is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

SENS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-0.52% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CERS($516M) has a higher market cap than SENS($315M). CERS YTD gains are higher at: 25.728 vs. SENS (15.217). CERS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 475K vs. SENS (-80.8M). CERS has more cash in the bank: 80.4M vs. SENS (64.3M). SENS has less debt than CERS: SENS (43.1M) vs CERS (97.4M). CERS has higher revenues than SENS: CERS (217M) vs SENS (40.7M).
CERSSENSCERS / SENS
Capitalization516M315M164%
EBITDA475K-80.8M-1%
Gain YTD25.72815.217169%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue217M40.7M533%
Total Cash80.4M64.3M125%
Total Debt97.4M43.1M226%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CERS vs SENS: Fundamental Ratings
CERS
SENS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6688
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
96100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3949
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10033
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CERS's Valuation (33) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as SENS (55) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that CERS’s stock grew similarly to SENS’s over the last 12 months.

CERS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as SENS (100) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that CERS’s stock grew similarly to SENS’s over the last 12 months.

CERS's SMR Rating (96) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as SENS (100) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that CERS’s stock grew similarly to SENS’s over the last 12 months.

CERS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as SENS (49) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that CERS’s stock grew similarly to SENS’s over the last 12 months.

SENS's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for CERS (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that SENS’s stock grew significantly faster than CERS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CERSSENS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CERS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SENS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QCBGX22.65N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
FHKAX74.33N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
STNFX45.55N/A
N/A
Allspring Large Cap Growth Inst
GLNMX25.91N/A
N/A
MFS Global New Discovery R4
HILDX26.89N/A
N/A
Hartford International Value F

CERS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CERS has been loosely correlated with ICUI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CERS jumps, then ICUI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CERS
1D Price
Change %
CERS100%
-4.07%
ICUI - CERS
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.01%
UTMD - CERS
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
BLFS - CERS
45%
Loosely correlated
-4.42%
RVTY - CERS
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
ATRC - CERS
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.22%
More

SENS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SENS has been loosely correlated with QSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SENS jumps, then QSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SENS
1D Price
Change %
SENS100%
-5.64%
QSI - SENS
37%
Loosely correlated
-7.79%
CERS - SENS
35%
Loosely correlated
-4.07%
VIVO - SENS
32%
Poorly correlated
+7.71%
FEED - SENS
31%
Poorly correlated
+4.26%
PACB - SENS
30%
Poorly correlated
-5.71%
More