CESDF
Price
$6.02
Change
+$0.04 (+0.67%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
1.3B
GZPZF
Price
$147.38
Change
+$8.38 (+6.03%)
Updated
Feb 20 closing price
Capitalization
6.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CESDF vs GZPZF

Header iconCESDF vs GZPZF Comparison
Open Charts CESDF vs GZPZFBanner chart's image
CES Energy Solutions
Price$6.02
Change+$0.04 (+0.67%)
Volume$3.34K
Capitalization1.3B
Gaztransport Technigaz
Price$147.38
Change+$8.38 (+6.03%)
Volume$5.34K
Capitalization6.76B
CESDF vs GZPZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CESDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CESDF vs. GZPZF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CESDF is a Buy and GZPZF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CESDF: $6.02 vs. GZPZF: $147.38)
Brand notoriety: CESDF and GZPZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CESDF: 41% vs. GZPZF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CESDF: $1.3B vs. GZPZF: $6.76B
CESDF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $1.3B. GZPZF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $6.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $54.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CESDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGZPZF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CESDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GZPZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CESDF is a better buy in the long-term than GZPZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CESDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CESDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CESDF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +3.40% price change this week, while GZPZF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +4.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+4.01% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GZPZF($6.76B) has a higher market cap than CESDF($1.31B). GZPZF has higher P/E ratio than CESDF: GZPZF (14.00) vs CESDF (10.41). GZPZF YTD gains are higher at: 6.029 vs. CESDF (-12.656). GZPZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 543M vs. CESDF (370M). CESDF has higher revenues than GZPZF: CESDF (2.42B) vs GZPZF (735M).
CESDFGZPZFCESDF / GZPZF
Capitalization1.31B6.76B19%
EBITDA370M543M68%
Gain YTD-12.6566.029-210%
P/E Ratio10.4114.0074%
Revenue2.42B735M329%
Total CashN/A360M-
Total Debt471MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CESDF vs GZPZF: Fundamental Ratings
CESDF
GZPZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1148
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
267
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4572
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GZPZF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is in the same range as CESDF (39). This means that GZPZF’s stock grew similarly to CESDF’s over the last 12 months.

GZPZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as CESDF (26). This means that GZPZF’s stock grew similarly to CESDF’s over the last 12 months.

GZPZF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CESDF (100). This means that GZPZF’s stock grew similarly to CESDF’s over the last 12 months.

CESDF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as GZPZF (72). This means that CESDF’s stock grew similarly to GZPZF’s over the last 12 months.

CESDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GZPZF (100). This means that CESDF’s stock grew similarly to GZPZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CESDFGZPZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CESDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LCTD52.400.24
+0.46%
BlackRock World ex US Cbn Tnstn Rdns ETF
AIVI50.260.10
+0.20%
WisdomTree Intl Al Enhanced Val ETF
BSCW20.760.01
+0.05%
Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corp Bd ETF
CPST26.520.01
+0.04%
Calamos S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF-Sep
SIJ11.83-0.03
-0.24%
ProShares UltraShort Industrials

CESDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CESDF has been loosely correlated with SUBCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CESDF jumps, then SUBCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CESDF
1D Price
Change %
CESDF100%
+0.57%
SUBCY - CESDF
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.53%
FTI - CESDF
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
OII - CESDF
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
NOV - CESDF
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
WFRD - CESDF
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
More

GZPZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GZPZF and TNRSF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GZPZF and TNRSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GZPZF
1D Price
Change %
GZPZF100%
N/A
TNRSF - GZPZF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FTK - GZPZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
CTNR - GZPZF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CESDF - GZPZF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
CHOLF - GZPZF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More