CEVA
Price
$32.71
Change
-$0.57 (-1.71%)
Updated
Aug 17 closing price
Capitalization
920.92M
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RMBS
Price
$100.61
Change
-$0.24 (-0.24%)
Updated
Aug 17 closing price
Capitalization
10.91B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CEVA vs RMBS

CEVA vs RMBS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CEVA vs. RMBS commentary
Aug 18, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEVA is a Hold and RMBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2026
Stock price -- (CEVA: $33.28 vs. RMBS: $100.85)
Brand notoriety: CEVA and RMBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CEVA: 180% vs. RMBS: 25%
Market capitalization -- CEVA: $936.97M vs. RMBS: $10.91B
CEVA [@Semiconductors] is valued at $936.97M. RMBS’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $10.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $5.45T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $195.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CEVA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CEVA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMBS is a better buy in the long-term than CEVA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CEVA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CEVA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RMBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMBS is a better buy in the short-term than CEVA.

Price Growth

CEVA (@Semiconductors) experienced а -13.94% price change this week, while RMBS (@Semiconductors) price change was -0.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +5.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +51.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

CEVA is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

RMBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+5.08% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMBS($10.9B) has a higher market cap than CEVA($921M). CEVA has higher P/E ratio than RMBS: CEVA (237.33) vs RMBS (46.16). CEVA YTD gains are higher at: 54.647 vs. RMBS (9.751). RMBS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 340M vs. CEVA (-7.78M). RMBS has more cash in the bank: 825M vs. CEVA (216M). CEVA has less debt than RMBS: CEVA (16.9M) vs RMBS (21.8M). RMBS has higher revenues than CEVA: RMBS (756M) vs CEVA (112M).
CEVARMBSCEVA / RMBS
Capitalization921M10.9B8%
EBITDA-7.78M340M-2%
Gain YTD54.6479.751560%
P/E Ratio237.3346.16514%
Revenue112M756M15%
Total Cash216M825M26%
Total Debt16.9M21.8M78%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CEVA vs RMBS: Fundamental Ratings
CEVA
RMBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5326
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10054
SMR RATING
1..100
9350
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4426
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMBS's Valuation (66) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as CEVA (89). This means that RMBS’s stock grew similarly to CEVA’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CEVA (100). This means that RMBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CEVA’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's SMR Rating (50) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CEVA (93). This means that RMBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CEVA’s over the last 12 months.

CEVA's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as RMBS (59). This means that CEVA’s stock grew similarly to RMBS’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as CEVA (44). This means that RMBS’s stock grew similarly to CEVA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CEVARMBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CEVA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RMBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VSOIX55.660.25
+0.45%
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp I
YCGEX29.160.07
+0.24%
YCG Enhanced
DLACX15.740.02
+0.13%
BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Y
JEEBX19.500.02
+0.10%
JHancock Infrastructure A
FBCHX308.11-0.65
-0.21%
Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth C

CEVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CEVA has been closely correlated with AMKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CEVA jumps, then AMKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CEVA
1D Price
Change %
CEVA100%
+9.58%
AMKR - CEVA
70%
Closely correlated
+2.15%
SYNA - CEVA
69%
Closely correlated
+1.23%
AIP - CEVA
67%
Closely correlated
+2.65%
RMBS - CEVA
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.53%
ENTG - CEVA
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
More