CF Industries Holdings (CF) and The Mosaic Company (MOS) are leading players in the fertilizer sector, producing essential nitrogen and phosphate/potash products, respectively, that support global agriculture. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, business models, and market positioning in the context of tightening supply chains and volatile commodity prices. Traders seeking short-term momentum and investors eyeing sector exposure amid geopolitical disruptions in fertilizer shipments will find these insights valuable for evaluating relative performance and potential trade-offs in the current market environment.
CF Industries Holdings (CF), the world's largest producer of ammonia and nitrogen fertilizers, benefits from low-cost U.S. natural gas as a key input. In recent market activity, shares have traded around $115, reflecting a year-to-date gain of about 49.5% despite short-term pullbacks amid broader sector softness. Strong Q1 2026 results, with net earnings of $615 million and adjusted EBITDA of $983 million, exceeded expectations, fueled by high ammonia production rates exceeding 99% of capacity and a tight global nitrogen supply-demand balance tightened further by Middle East disruptions. Sentiment remains positive due to robust cash flows, share repurchases, and nitrogen price support from supply shocks, positioning CF favorably for spring planting demand.
The Mosaic Company (MOS) is a major producer of concentrated phosphate and potash crop nutrients, operating mines and facilities globally across Phosphates, Potash, and Mosaic Fertilizantes segments. Shares have traded near $22, down about 7.1% year-to-date and 29% over the past year, pressured by weak North American phosphate demand and elevated input costs like sulfur. Q4 2025 results showed revenues of $2.97 billion missing estimates, with adjusted EPS of $0.22 amid lower volumes; Q1 2026 EPS is forecasted at $0.20, a 59% year-over-year drop. Recent actions include idling Brazilian facilities to cut output and costs, supporting long-term efficiency but highlighting near-term challenges in softer potash and phosphate markets despite international demand.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing AI trading bots from its library of over 350 bots that generate real-time signals across thousands of tickers in stocks, ETFs, and crypto. AI analyzes all bots to spotlight the 25 most promising ones suited to current volatility and market conditions, featuring diverse strategies like momentum, sector rotation, and swing trading on timeframes from 15 minutes to daily. Standout performers include bots with annualized returns up to +285%, win rates of 50-88%, and profit factors from 1.5 to 11.7, covering sectors such as semiconductors (e.g., +95% return on LRCX/TER), industrials (+88%), and space infrastructure (+285%). These bots trade sets of 3-18 tickers with risk management, offering copy trading without balance minimums for some. Explore Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots to identify strategies aligning with today’s opportunities.
While both CF and MOS operate in fertilizers, CF’s pure nitrogen focus contrasts with MOS’s diversified phosphate (60% of sales) and potash exposure, making CF more sensitive to ammonia prices and MOS to crop nutrient blends. Growth drivers differ: CF leverages U.S. gas advantages and clean ammonia initiatives, while MOS pursues cost cuts via facility idling and international sales. Recent momentum strongly favors CF with 49.5% YTD gains versus MOS’s -7.1%, reflecting nitrogen strength over phosphate weakness. Risk factors include commodity volatility and geopolitics for both, but MOS carries higher debt ($4.8B vs. CF’s $3.6B) and faces U.S. demand softness. Sector exposure ties them to agriculture, yet CF’s lower P/E (10.4 vs. 13.1) and superior EBITDA ($3.7B vs. $2.5B) signal better relative value and sentiment in tight nitrogen markets.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors CF over MOS, based on superior trend consistency from robust Q1 earnings, higher YTD returns, and stronger positioning in nitrogen amid supply catalysts like Middle East disruptions. CF’s lower valuation multiples and operational stability enhance its probabilistic edge in the near term, though MOS could rebound with phosphate recovery.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMOS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а +1.84% price change this week, while MOS (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -3.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.21%.
CF is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
MOS is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.
The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
| CF | MOS | CF / MOS | |
| Capitalization | 20B | 7.12B | 281% |
| EBITDA | 3.7B | 2.5B | 148% |
| Gain YTD | 69.493 | -6.273 | -1,108% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.75 | 159.93 | 7% |
| Revenue | 7.41B | 12.1B | 61% |
| Total Cash | 2.04B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 3.62B | 4.8B | 75% |
CF | MOS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 43 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MOS's Valuation (43) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CF (89). This means that MOS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CF’s over the last 12 months.
CF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is significantly better than the same rating for MOS (100). This means that CF’s stock grew significantly faster than MOS’s over the last 12 months.
CF's SMR Rating (27) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is significantly better than the same rating for MOS (94). This means that CF’s stock grew significantly faster than MOS’s over the last 12 months.
CF's Price Growth Rating (19) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOS (65). This means that CF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOS’s over the last 12 months.
MOS's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CF (43). This means that MOS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CF’s over the last 12 months.
| CF | MOS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 7 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 67% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AWP | 11.89 | 0.01 | +0.08% |
| abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund | |||
| IBDW | 20.83 | -0.05 | -0.24% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corp ETF | |||
| JPMB | 39.92 | -0.13 | -0.32% |
| JPMorgan USD Emerging Mkts Svr Bd ETF | |||
| KNO | 59.80 | -0.39 | -0.65% |
| AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF | |||
| FFGX | 33.74 | -0.62 | -1.79% |
| Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF | |||