CF
Price
$130.39
Change
+$5.91 (+4.75%)
Updated
May 12 closing price
Capitalization
20.03B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MOS
Price
$22.39
Change
+$0.60 (+2.75%)
Updated
May 12 closing price
Capitalization
7.12B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CF vs MOS

Header iconCF vs MOS Comparison
Open Charts CF vs MOSBanner chart's image
CF vs MOS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? CF Industries Holdings (CF) vs. The Mosaic Company (MOS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CF has significantly outperformed MOS year-to-date, with gains of approximately 49.5% compared to MOS's decline of about 7.1%.
  • CF reported strong Q1 2026 results, including net earnings of $615 million and adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) of $983 million, driven by tight global nitrogen markets.
  • MOS faces softer demand in phosphates and potash, with Q4 2025 results missing estimates due to weak volumes and higher costs; Q1 earnings are anticipated lower.
  • Both stocks benefit from fertilizer sector tailwinds like supply disruptions, but CF's nitrogen focus provides stronger recent momentum.
  • CF trades at a lower trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of 10.36 versus MOS's 13.05, with a larger market cap of $17.7 billion compared to $7.1 billion.
  • Market sentiment favors CF amid recent nitrogen price strength from Middle East supply issues.

Introduction

CF Industries Holdings (CF) and The Mosaic Company (MOS) are leading players in the fertilizer sector, producing essential nitrogen and phosphate/potash products, respectively, that support global agriculture. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, business models, and market positioning in the context of tightening supply chains and volatile commodity prices. Traders seeking short-term momentum and investors eyeing sector exposure amid geopolitical disruptions in fertilizer shipments will find these insights valuable for evaluating relative performance and potential trade-offs in the current market environment.

CF Overview and Recent Performance

CF Industries Holdings (CF), the world's largest producer of ammonia and nitrogen fertilizers, benefits from low-cost U.S. natural gas as a key input. In recent market activity, shares have traded around $115, reflecting a year-to-date gain of about 49.5% despite short-term pullbacks amid broader sector softness. Strong Q1 2026 results, with net earnings of $615 million and adjusted EBITDA of $983 million, exceeded expectations, fueled by high ammonia production rates exceeding 99% of capacity and a tight global nitrogen supply-demand balance tightened further by Middle East disruptions. Sentiment remains positive due to robust cash flows, share repurchases, and nitrogen price support from supply shocks, positioning CF favorably for spring planting demand.

MOS Overview and Recent Performance

The Mosaic Company (MOS) is a major producer of concentrated phosphate and potash crop nutrients, operating mines and facilities globally across Phosphates, Potash, and Mosaic Fertilizantes segments. Shares have traded near $22, down about 7.1% year-to-date and 29% over the past year, pressured by weak North American phosphate demand and elevated input costs like sulfur. Q4 2025 results showed revenues of $2.97 billion missing estimates, with adjusted EPS of $0.22 amid lower volumes; Q1 2026 EPS is forecasted at $0.20, a 59% year-over-year drop. Recent actions include idling Brazilian facilities to cut output and costs, supporting long-term efficiency but highlighting near-term challenges in softer potash and phosphate markets despite international demand.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing AI trading bots from its library of over 350 bots that generate real-time signals across thousands of tickers in stocks, ETFs, and crypto. AI analyzes all bots to spotlight the 25 most promising ones suited to current volatility and market conditions, featuring diverse strategies like momentum, sector rotation, and swing trading on timeframes from 15 minutes to daily. Standout performers include bots with annualized returns up to +285%, win rates of 50-88%, and profit factors from 1.5 to 11.7, covering sectors such as semiconductors (e.g., +95% return on LRCX/TER), industrials (+88%), and space infrastructure (+285%). These bots trade sets of 3-18 tickers with risk management, offering copy trading without balance minimums for some. Explore Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots to identify strategies aligning with today’s opportunities.

Head-to-Head Comparison

While both CF and MOS operate in fertilizers, CF’s pure nitrogen focus contrasts with MOS’s diversified phosphate (60% of sales) and potash exposure, making CF more sensitive to ammonia prices and MOS to crop nutrient blends. Growth drivers differ: CF leverages U.S. gas advantages and clean ammonia initiatives, while MOS pursues cost cuts via facility idling and international sales. Recent momentum strongly favors CF with 49.5% YTD gains versus MOS’s -7.1%, reflecting nitrogen strength over phosphate weakness. Risk factors include commodity volatility and geopolitics for both, but MOS carries higher debt ($4.8B vs. CF’s $3.6B) and faces U.S. demand softness. Sector exposure ties them to agriculture, yet CF’s lower P/E (10.4 vs. 13.1) and superior EBITDA ($3.7B vs. $2.5B) signal better relative value and sentiment in tight nitrogen markets.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors CF over MOS, based on superior trend consistency from robust Q1 earnings, higher YTD returns, and stronger positioning in nitrogen amid supply catalysts like Middle East disruptions. CF’s lower valuation multiples and operational stability enhance its probabilistic edge in the near term, though MOS could rebound with phosphate recovery.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
CF vs. MOS commentary
May 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CF is a Hold and MOS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 13, 2026
Stock price -- (CF: $130.39 vs. MOS: $22.39)
Brand notoriety: CF and MOS are both notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CF: 75% vs. MOS: 105%
Market capitalization -- CF: $20.03B vs. MOS: $7.12B
CF [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $20.03B. MOS’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $7.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $55.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $5.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMOS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MOS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CF is a better buy in the long-term than MOS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MOS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CF is a better buy in the short-term than MOS.

Price Growth

CF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а +1.84% price change this week, while MOS (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -3.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

CF is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

MOS is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (+0.72% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CF($20B) has a higher market cap than MOS($7.12B). MOS has higher P/E ratio than CF: MOS (159.93) vs CF (11.75). CF YTD gains are higher at: 69.493 vs. MOS (-6.273). CF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.7B vs. MOS (2.5B). CF has less debt than MOS: CF (3.62B) vs MOS (4.8B). MOS has higher revenues than CF: MOS (12.1B) vs CF (7.41B).
CFMOSCF / MOS
Capitalization20B7.12B281%
EBITDA3.7B2.5B148%
Gain YTD69.493-6.273-1,108%
P/E Ratio11.75159.937%
Revenue7.41B12.1B61%
Total Cash2.04BN/A-
Total Debt3.62B4.8B75%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CF vs MOS: Fundamental Ratings
CF
MOS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6851
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31100
SMR RATING
1..100
2794
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1965
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
432
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MOS's Valuation (43) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CF (89). This means that MOS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CF’s over the last 12 months.

CF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is significantly better than the same rating for MOS (100). This means that CF’s stock grew significantly faster than MOS’s over the last 12 months.

CF's SMR Rating (27) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is significantly better than the same rating for MOS (94). This means that CF’s stock grew significantly faster than MOS’s over the last 12 months.

CF's Price Growth Rating (19) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOS (65). This means that CF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOS’s over the last 12 months.

MOS's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CF (43). This means that MOS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFMOS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MOS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AWP11.890.01
+0.08%
abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund
IBDW20.83-0.05
-0.24%
iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corp ETF
JPMB39.92-0.13
-0.32%
JPMorgan USD Emerging Mkts Svr Bd ETF
KNO59.80-0.39
-0.65%
AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF
FFGX33.74-0.62
-1.79%
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF