Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFAGX vs FSMAX
CFAGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CFAGX vs FSMAX
CFAGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFAGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFAGX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. CFAGX (126M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CFAGX: FSMAX (0.48) vs CFAGX (0.07). CFAGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CFAGX (32 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CFAGX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CFAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFAGX: FSMAX (0) vs CFAGX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.67 vs. CFAGX (-18.66). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.59 vs. CFAGX (-32.74).
| CFAGX | FSMAX | CFAGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.04 | 2,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.04 | 2,400% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.608 | 16.937 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 126M | 43.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.48 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.66 | 25.67 | -73% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.04 | 68.76 | -16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.74 | 35.59 | -92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.67 | 149.51 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers