Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFAGX vs FSMAX
CFAGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CFAGX vs FSMAX
CFAGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFAGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFAGX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. CFAGX (123M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CFAGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs CFAGX (0.07). CFAGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CFAGX (32 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CFAGX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CFAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFAGX: FSMAX (0) vs CFAGX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.60 vs. CFAGX (-16.76). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.00 vs. CFAGX (-31.87).
| CFAGX | FSMAX | CFAGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.04 | 2,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.04 | 2,400% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.634 | 19.519 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 123M | 40.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.50 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.76 | 23.60 | -71% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.13 | 70.81 | -14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.87 | 40.00 | -80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.19 | 140.28 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement