CFG
Price
$65.24
Change
+$0.36 (+0.55%)
Updated
Oct 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
27.33B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RF
Price
$28.40
Change
+$0.35 (+1.25%)
Updated
Oct 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
23.9B
92 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFG vs RF

CFG vs RF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 12, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Citizens Financial Group (CFG) vs. Regions Financial (RF) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CFG has delivered stronger relative performance over the past year, while RF has pulled back sharply in recent weeks.
  • Both are large U.S. regional banks with comparable capital strength, but their growth profiles and fee-income strategies differ meaningfully.
  • CFG's earnings are being driven by net interest income (NII) expansion and rapid Private Bank growth, while RF leans on deposit discipline and its high-growth Southeastern footprint.
  • RF carries a higher dividend yield and lower valuation multiple, whereas CFG trades at a richer price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio with a broader "Buy" consensus.
  • Analyst sentiment currently skews more constructive toward CFG, with RF holding a mixed "Hold" consensus.

Introduction

Regional banks occupy a distinct place in the financials sector, offering a balance of lending growth, deposit franchises, and shareholder returns. Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF) are two prominent names in this category, each with different geographic footprints and strategic priorities. This stock comparison is relevant for investors and traders evaluating relative performance, market positioning, and which institution is better positioned in the current rate and credit environment. By examining recent momentum, earnings quality, and valuation side by side, readers can better understand the trade-offs between these two regional banking franchises.

CFG Overview and Recent Performance

Citizens Financial Group, headquartered in Providence, Rhode Island, operates a diversified regional banking franchise spanning consumer banking, commercial banking, wealth management, and a growing Private Bank. In recent market activity, CFG has been a relative outperformer, gaining more than 20% over the trailing year and outperforming its industry benchmark. Recent quarterly results have reinforced that momentum: earnings per share (EPS) rose sharply year over year, supported by a 12% increase in NII and double-digit growth in non-interest income.

Several factors have shaped sentiment. The bank's net interest margin (NIM), a measure of lending profitability, has expanded as fixed-rate assets reprice and non-core exposures run off. Its Private Bank, launched in 2023, has grown rapidly and now contributes meaningfully to deposits and loans. Management has also signaled confidence, guiding toward NII growth near the upper end of its target range. A September 2026 credit-rating upgrade from Fitch to "A-" further underscored the franchise's improving earnings power and diversified model. The combination of stronger margins, fee-income momentum, and a robust capital return program has kept CFG in favor with much of the analyst community.

RF Overview and Recent Performance

Regions Financial Corporation, based in Birmingham, Alabama, serves consumer and commercial customers across the Southeastern and Midwestern United States, with a meaningful presence in high-growth Sun Belt markets. Unlike its peer, RF has experienced choppier price action recently, with shares pulling back roughly 11% over the past month despite longer-term gains. The stock's one-year performance has been more modest than CFG's, reflecting a period of investor reassessment.

Fundamentally, RF has continued to execute. Recent quarterly results showed higher net income and EPS, a solid return on tangible common equity (ROTCE) near 18%, and improving credit metrics. The company raised its quarterly common dividend by roughly 13%, supporting a dividend yield well above the industry average. Its Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio, a key measure of a bank's loss-absorbing capital, remains strong at around 10.7%. However, softer near-term NII guidance, a slightly lower net interest margin, and a leadership transition in its finance ranks have contributed to the recent share-price weakness and a more cautious investor posture.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a data-driven edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of the platform's most relevant automated strategies. Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI Trading Bots, collectively covering thousands of tickers across different asset classes and timeframes. Because each bot operates with its own trading style, strategy, and risk profile, only a select group is featured in the Trending AI Robots section — those judged most suitable for current market conditions. The page highlights measurable statistics, including win rates and performance ranges, helping users evaluate how different bots have adapted to shifting volatility and sector rotation. For investors tracking names like CFG and RF, exploring these tools can provide an additional, systematic perspective on momentum and trend. Visit the Trending AI Robots page to review the currently featured strategies.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most visible contrast between the two banks is relative performance. CFG has sustained stronger momentum, while RF has lagged recently. In terms of business model, CFG has leaned into a more diversified, fee-heavy franchise through wealth management, capital markets, and Private Bank expansion. RF, by contrast, emphasizes deposit discipline, cost control, and penetration of fast-growing Southeastern and Texas markets.

Valuation and income characteristics also diverge. RF trades at a lower P/E multiple and offers a higher dividend yield, which may appeal to income-focused investors. CFG commands a higher multiple, reflecting stronger earnings growth expectations and a more favorable consensus rating. Risk profiles differ as well: CFG's growth strategy carries execution risk around its transformation program, while RF faces competitive deposit pressure in the Southeast and modestly softer fee-income trends. Both maintain solid CET1 ratios, so capital strength is not a decisive differentiator.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings momentum, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward CFG in the current environment. The stock's steadier uptrend, expanding NIM, accelerating NII, and stronger analyst consensus suggest a more favorable risk-reward profile at present. However, this is a probabilistic assessment rather than a definitive prediction. RF's higher yield and lower valuation could regain favor if its share price stabilizes and fee-income momentum improves. As market conditions shift, the relative attractiveness of these two franchises may change accordingly.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CFG vs. RF commentary
Oct 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFG is a StrongBuy and RF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for CFG with price predictions
Oct 22, 2026

CFG's MACD Histogram just turned positive

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CFG turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where CFG's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 35 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where CFG's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 16 of 22 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CFG as a result. In 59 of 90 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.

Following a +1.59% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CFG advanced for three days, in 192 of 296 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.

CFG may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CFG declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 61%.

The Aroon Indicator for CFG entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 6 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 7 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 43 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 43 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 55, placing this stock slightly better than average.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 51 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. CFG’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 66 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.135) is normal, around the industry mean (1.268). P/E Ratio (13.953) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.372). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.647) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.028) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.304) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for RF with price predictions
Oct 22, 2026

RF's RSI Oscillator ascending out of oversold territory

The RSI Indicator for RF moved out of oversold territory on October 08, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 30 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 21 of the 30 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 70%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 12, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on RF as a result. In 44 of 72 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for RF just turned positive on October 08, 2026. Looking at past instances where RF's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 27 of 43 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 63%.

Following a +1.98% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where RF advanced for three days, in 191 of 315 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where RF declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 63%.

RF broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 20, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

The Aroon Indicator for RF entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 7 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 33 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 34 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 55, placing this stock slightly better than average.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 52 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. RF’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 63 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.368) is normal, around the industry mean (1.268). P/E Ratio (11.356) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.372). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.424) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.043) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.269) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFG vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
CFG
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7319
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4334
SMR RATING
1..100
67
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5152
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4333
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
785

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RF's Valuation (63) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (66) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (43) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's SMR Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (7) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (52) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

RF's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (43) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFGRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 23, 2026
Stock price -- (CFG: $64.88 vs. RF: $28.05)
Brand notoriety: CFG: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFG: 117% vs. RF: 109%
Market capitalization -- CFG: $27.33B vs. RF: $23.9B
CFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $27.33B. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $23.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $147.93 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while RF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CFG and RF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFG is a better buy in the short-term than RF.

Price Growth

CFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.69% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2027.

RF is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2027.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.63% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
CFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFG has been closely correlated with RF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFG jumps, then RF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFG
1D Price
Change %
CFG100%
+0.55%
RF - CFG
89%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
FITB - CFG
88%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
ONB - CFG
87%
Closely correlated
+2.32%
USB - CFG
86%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
MTB - CFG
86%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
More

RF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RF has been closely correlated with MTB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RF jumps, then MTB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RF
1D Price
Change %
RF100%
+1.25%
MTB - RF
90%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
FITB - RF
89%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
CFG - RF
88%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
TFC - RF
87%
Closely correlated
+1.45%
HBAN - RF
86%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
More
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TOL141.086.03
+4.47%
Toll Brothers
LXEH1.540.05
+3.36%
Lixiang Education Holding Co. Ltd.
NWAX10.03-0.01
-0.10%
New America Acquisition I Corp.
NGVT69.84-0.85
-1.20%
Ingevity Corp
OKYO1.47-0.07
-4.55%
OKYO Pharma Limited