CFG
Price
$70.36
Change
+$0.02 (+0.03%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
29.75B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RF
Price
$31.07
Change
+$0.05 (+0.16%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
26.51B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFG vs RF

CFG vs RF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Citizens Financial Group (CFG) vs. Regions Financial (RF) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Citizens Financial Group (CFG) has delivered stronger year-to-date performance of approximately 22% compared to Regions Financial (RF) at about 17%, both outperforming the S&P 500.
  • CFG reported robust Q1 2026 results with net income up 39% year-over-year and EPS of $1.13, beating estimates, while RF posted EPS of $0.62, also above consensus.
  • Both regional banks are positioned ahead of Q2 2026 earnings reports, with CFG expecting $1.25 EPS and RF anticipating $0.64 EPS.
  • CFG stock has approached all-time highs near $72 recently, while RF has reached new peaks around $31, reflecting positive market sentiment for both.
  • CFG shows greater relative momentum in recent market activity, supported by higher earnings growth, whereas RF benefits from its Sunbelt market exposure and steady credit metrics.
  • Key contrasts include CFG's larger scale and fee income drivers versus RF's focus on Southeast regional growth and acquisition synergies.

Introduction

This comparison examines Citizens Financial Group (CFG) and Regions Financial (RF), two prominent regional banks operating in the U.S. financial sector. Both companies provide retail, commercial, and wealth management services, making them relevant for investors seeking exposure to domestic banking trends amid evolving interest rate environments and economic conditions. Traders and portfolio managers focused on relative performance, earnings momentum, and sector positioning may find this analysis useful for evaluating opportunities within the regional banking space.

CFG Overview and Recent Performance

Citizens Financial Group (CFG) operates as a diversified financial services company offering banking, lending, and investment solutions primarily across the Northeast and Midwest. In recent weeks, the stock has shown resilience, trading near $70 and posting year-to-date gains of approximately 22%, outpacing broader market benchmarks. Recent market activity has been supported by strong first-quarter 2026 earnings, where net income rose 39% year-over-year to $517 million and earnings per share reached $1.13, exceeding analyst expectations. Positive operating leverage and net interest margin expansion contributed to improved sentiment. The company is scheduled to report second-quarter results shortly, with consensus estimates pointing to continued earnings growth.

RF Overview and Recent Performance

Regions Financial (RF) provides banking, mortgage, and wealth management services with a significant presence in the Southeast and Sunbelt regions. The stock has traded around $31 in recent market activity, delivering year-to-date returns of roughly 17% and achieving all-time highs. First-quarter 2026 results featured earnings per share of $0.62, surpassing estimates, alongside steady revenue and controlled credit quality. Recent performance reflects gains of about 8% over the past three months, aided by loan demand and disciplined expense management. The bank is set to release second-quarter earnings imminently, with analysts projecting modest EPS growth.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron maintains a curated selection of AI trading bots designed for various market conditions. The platform offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, yet only the strongest performers suited to prevailing trends earn placement in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots feature diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, with examples including ranges of annualized returns, Sharpe ratios, and profit factors derived from forward testing. Selection emphasizes observable metrics such as consistency and adaptability across equities. Investors interested in automated strategies can explore the full range on the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Citizens Financial Group (CFG) and Regions Financial (RF) share similar business models as regional banks but differ in geographic focus and scale. CFG maintains broader Northeast exposure and emphasizes fee-based wealth and capital markets income, supporting stronger recent earnings momentum. RF concentrates on Southeast markets, where demographic and economic growth provides distinct drivers, complemented by recent acquisition activity. In terms of recent momentum, CFG has recorded higher year-to-date appreciation. Risk factors for both include interest rate sensitivity and credit cycles, though RF's regional concentration may introduce different economic correlations. Market sentiment has favored CFG's earnings trajectory in recent activity, while RF offers potentially attractive valuation relative to growth prospects in its core territories.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including stronger year-to-date returns, consistent earnings beats, and favorable relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of outperformance to Citizens Financial Group (CFG) over Regions Financial (RF) in the near term. This assessment draws from trend consistency and recent catalysts without implying certainty.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CFG vs. RF commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFG is a Hold and RF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (CFG: $70.36 vs. RF: $31.07)
Brand notoriety: CFG: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFG: 85% vs. RF: 82%
Market capitalization -- CFG: $29.75B vs. RF: $26.51B
CFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $29.75B. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $26.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the long-term than CFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the short-term than CFG.

Price Growth

CFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.43% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFG is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.

RF is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFG($29.8B) has a higher market cap than RF($26.5B). CFG has higher P/E ratio than RF: CFG (16.67) vs RF (12.89). CFG YTD gains are higher at: 22.177 vs. RF (16.858). CFG has more cash in the bank: 12.7B vs. RF (3.45B). RF has less debt than CFG: RF (5.14B) vs CFG (12.3B). CFG has higher revenues than RF: CFG (8.48B) vs RF (7.62B).
CFGRFCFG / RF
Capitalization29.8B26.5B112%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.17716.858132%
P/E Ratio16.6712.89129%
Revenue8.48B7.62B111%
Total Cash12.7B3.45B369%
Total Debt12.3B5.14B239%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFG vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
CFG
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2533
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4030
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1620
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4042
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RF's Valuation (41) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (57) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (40) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

RF's SMR Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (9) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (20) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (42) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFGRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PED12.821.42
+12.46%
PEDEVCO Corp
MKTX115.371.51
+1.33%
MarketAxess Holdings
RERE3.980.03
+0.76%
ATRenew
BBDO3.15-0.04
-1.25%
Banco Bradesco SA
PRSO0.75-0.06
-7.00%
Peraso

CFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFG has been closely correlated with KEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFG jumps, then KEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFG
1D Price
Change %
CFG100%
+0.03%
KEY - CFG
90%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
ZION - CFG
87%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
FNB - CFG
87%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
TFC - CFG
86%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
WTFC - CFG
85%
Closely correlated
-0.01%
More