CFG
Price
$63.36
Change
-$0.07 (-0.11%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
27.29B
95 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TFC
Price
$47.07
Change
+$0.50 (+1.07%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
57.53B
95 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFG vs TFC

CFG vs TFC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 12, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Citizens Financial Group (CFG) vs. Truist Financial (TFC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CFG has delivered stronger recent relative performance, gaining more than 20% over the past 52 weeks versus a mid-single-digit gain for TFC.
  • Analysts assign CFG a consensus "Buy" rating, while TFC carries a "Hold" consensus, reflecting differing views on near-term growth momentum.
  • TFC is the larger institution with a higher dividend yield (roughly 4.5% versus about 2.9% for CFG), appealing more to income-oriented investors.
  • CFG is expanding its Private Bank and seeing accelerating net interest income (NII), while TFC is repositioning toward fee income and digital transformation.
  • Both names report Q3 results in mid-October, a near-term catalyst that could shift sentiment for either stock.

Introduction

Citizens Financial Group (CFG) and Truist Financial (TFC) are two prominent U.S. regional banks frequently grouped together by investors seeking exposure to the super-regional banking sector. Although both operate in similar rate-sensitive environments, they differ meaningfully in scale, strategy, and recent market positioning. This stock comparison is relevant for traders and investors weighing growth momentum against dividend income, and for those tracking how regional banks are repositioning their balance sheets and fee businesses in a shifting interest-rate landscape. Examining their relative performance side by side helps clarify where each institution currently stands.

CFG Overview and Recent Performance

Citizens Financial Group, headquartered in Providence, Rhode Island, is a diversified commercial and consumer bank with a growing wealth and capital-markets franchise. In recent weeks, CFG has traded with notable strength, gaining more than 20% over the trailing 52-week period and outperforming the broader market. Its first-quarter results showed earnings per share (EPS) rising roughly 47% year over year, supported by a 12% increase in net interest income (NII) and an expanding net interest margin (NIM).

Several factors have shaped sentiment. A credit-rating upgrade from Fitch to "A-" cited an improved earnings profile and a strong deposit franchise, while analysts at firms including Baird and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods have maintained or raised constructive views. The bank's Private Bank unit has scaled quickly, adding deposits and loans and strengthening its fee-based revenue mix. Management has signaled that NII growth could exceed its initial full-year target, reinforcing a generally positive outlook among analysts.

TFC Overview and Recent Performance

Truist Financial, formed from the 2019 merger of BB&T and SunTrust, is a large super-regional bank serving the Southeastern and Mid-Atlantic United States. Over the same recent period, TFC has posted more modest gains, rising in the low single digits over the trailing 52 weeks and trading near the lower half of its 52-week range. Its first-quarter EPS rose about 25% year over year, with revenue growth reflecting continued discipline across its lending and fee businesses.

Sentiment around TFC has been shaped by its ongoing strategic repositioning. Following the 2024 divestiture of its insurance business, the company has emphasized recurring, client-driven fee income, investment banking, and wealth management. Management upgraded its 2026 fee-income outlook and is pursuing a multi-year investment program focused on digital capabilities and AI-enabled productivity tools. A larger share-repurchase authorization and a higher dividend yield support the stock's appeal, even as the consensus rating remains "Hold" amid mixed views on execution and expense levels.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a systematic approach to names like these, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of the platform's AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance statistics, and target watchlist. Because not every bot suits every market condition, only the most relevant and best-performing ones are featured in this trending section. Visitors can browse bots by ticker, compare historical performance, and evaluate how different strategies might approach stocks such as CFG and TFC. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to review the latest selections and statistics.

Head-to-Head Comparison

While both are regional banks, their market positioning differs in meaningful ways. TFC is roughly twice the size of CFG by market capitalization, giving it a larger balance sheet and broader geographic footprint, but also a heavier focus on expense management and restructuring after its insurance divestiture. CFG, by contrast, is positioned around a sharper growth narrative tied to its Private Bank and capital-markets expansion.

On momentum, CFG currently holds an edge. Its 52-week gain and Buy-rated consensus contrast with TFC's flatter recent performance and Hold consensus. Valuation also differs: TFC trades at a lower trailing price-to-earnings ratio and offers a higher dividend yield, which may appeal to value- and income-focused investors, while CFG's premium reflects stronger growth expectations. Risk factors are comparable—both face credit-cycle, rate, and deposit-cost pressures—but TFC's larger restructuring effort introduces additional execution risk, whereas CFG's smaller capital base leaves it somewhat more sensitive to rate volatility.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would likely favor CFG in the current environment. Its trend consistency, stronger relative performance, accelerating NII growth, and more constructive analyst consensus suggest more sustained momentum than TFC, which is still navigating a repositioning cycle. That said, this is a probabilistic assessment rather than a definitive forecast: TFC's higher dividend yield, lower valuation, and buyback capacity could make it a more attractive candidate if market conditions shift toward defensive or income-oriented positioning. The AI's preference would depend on trend stability, catalyst timing, and relative positioning at any given moment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CFG vs. TFC commentary
Oct 17, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFG is a Hold and TFC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for CFG with price predictions
Oct 16, 2026

CFG's Indicator enters downward trend

The Aroon Indicator for CFG entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor identified a pattern where the AroonDown red line was above 70 while the AroonUp green line was below 30 for three straight days. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. A.I.dvisor looked at 140 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator formed such a pattern. In 106 of the 140 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 76%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on September 16, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on CFG as a result. In 52 of 87 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 60%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CFG declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 61%.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where CFG's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 14 of 21 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 45 of 55 cases where CFG's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CFG just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where CFG's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 34 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.

Following a +1.42% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CFG advanced for three days, in 195 of 300 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.

CFG may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 6 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 7 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 43 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock slightly better than average.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 47 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.134) is normal, around the industry mean (1.323). P/E Ratio (14.118) is within average values for comparable stocks, (23.509). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.647) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.028) settles around the average of (0.030) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.304) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 55 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 58 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. CFG’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for TFC with price predictions
Oct 16, 2026

TFC in -2.29% downward trend, falling for three consecutive days on October 14, 2026

Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where TFC declined for three days, in 185 of 295 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 63%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

TFC broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 16, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

The Aroon Indicator for TFC entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where TFC's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 13 of 20 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 47 of 62 cases where TFC's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 15, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on TFC as a result. In 54 of 83 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for TFC just turned positive on October 12, 2026. Looking at past instances where TFC's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 32 of 43 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.

Following a +3.29% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where TFC advanced for three days, in 199 of 322 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 5 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 18 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.980) is normal, around the industry mean (1.323). P/E Ratio (10.825) is within average values for comparable stocks, (23.509). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.066) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.044) settles around the average of (0.030) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.954) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 54 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 59 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. TFC’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 88 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. TFC’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock worse than average.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFG vs TFC: Fundamental Ratings
CFG
TFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6381
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4388
SMR RATING
1..100
65
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5859
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5554
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
790

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TFC's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as CFG (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (88) in the null industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as CFG (6) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (59) in the null industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as CFG (55) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFGTFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 17, 2026
Stock price -- (CFG: $63.36 vs. TFC: $47.07)
Brand notoriety: CFG and TFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFG: 246% vs. TFC: 190%
Market capitalization -- CFG: $27.29B vs. TFC: $57.53B
CFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $27.29B. TFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $57.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while TFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFG is a better buy in the long-term than TFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CFG and TFC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.33% price change this week, while TFC (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2027.

TFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2027.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.49% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
CFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OHI45.640.11
+0.24%
Omega Healthcare Investors
VATE6.00-0.21
-3.38%
INNOVATE Corp
CTMX2.28-0.13
-5.39%
CytomX Therapeutics
DRMA0.86-0.05
-5.49%
Dermata Therapeutics Inc
ADEA20.42-1.32
-6.07%
Adeia

TFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TFC has been closely correlated with RF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TFC jumps, then RF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TFC
1D Price
Change %
TFC100%
+1.07%
RF - TFC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
KEY - TFC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
USB - TFC
86%
Closely correlated
+2.33%
FITB - TFC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
CFG - TFC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
More