CFG
Price
$47.72
Change
+$0.69 (+1.47%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
16.64B
12 days until earnings call
USB
Price
$47.93
Change
+$0.44 (+0.93%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
68.49B
12 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFG vs USB

Header iconCFG vs USB Comparison
Open Charts CFG vs USBBanner chart's image
Citizens Financial Group
Price$47.72
Change+$0.69 (+1.47%)
Volume$3.3M
Capitalization16.64B
US Ban
Price$47.93
Change+$0.44 (+0.93%)
Volume$7.04M
Capitalization68.49B
CFG vs USB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFG vs. USB commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFG is a StrongBuy and USB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CFG: $47.72 vs. USB: $47.93)
Brand notoriety: CFG: Not notable vs. USB: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFG: 71% vs. USB: 78%
Market capitalization -- CFG: $16.64B vs. USB: $68.49B
CFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $16.64B. USB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $68.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUSB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • USB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFG is a better buy in the long-term than USB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • USB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CFG and USB are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +8.16% price change this week, while USB (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFG is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

USB is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USB($68.5B) has a higher market cap than CFG($16.6B). USB has higher P/E ratio than CFG: USB (13.44) vs CFG (11.39). CFG YTD gains are higher at: 11.249 vs. USB (2.529). CFG has less debt than USB: CFG (14B) vs USB (62.9B). USB has higher revenues than CFG: USB (28B) vs CFG (8.22B).
CFGUSBCFG / USB
Capitalization16.6B68.5B24%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.2492.529445%
P/E Ratio11.3913.4485%
Revenue8.22B28B29%
Total Cash11.6BN/A-
Total Debt14B62.9B22%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFG vs USB: Fundamental Ratings
CFG
USB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4240
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4663
SMR RATING
1..100
63
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
820
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3668
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFG's Valuation (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as USB (79) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to USB’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as USB (63) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to USB’s over the last 12 months.

USB's SMR Rating (3) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (6) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that USB’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Price Growth Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as USB (20) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to USB’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as USB (68) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to USB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFGUSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VIS284.472.33
+0.82%
Vanguard Industrials ETF
SSUS45.510.37
+0.82%
Day Hagan Smart Sector ETF
PATN23.450.09
+0.39%
PACER FDS TR
WBIL32.16N/A
N/A
WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF
XSVN47.53N/A
N/A
BondBloxx Bloomberg SevenYrTrgDurUSTrETF

CFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFG has been closely correlated with HBAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFG jumps, then HBAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFG
1D Price
Change %
CFG100%
+1.47%
HBAN - CFG
92%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
SNV - CFG
91%
Closely correlated
N/A
ZION - CFG
91%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
TFC - CFG
91%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
PNC - CFG
90%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
More