Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFGRX vs RGACX
CFGRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CFGRX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.15
Change+$1.12 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.88B
CFGRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFGRX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFGRX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. CFGRX (251M). CFGRX pays higher dividends than RGACX: CFGRX (0.09) vs RGACX (0.07). CFGRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CFGRX (31 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CFGRX (0.74). CFGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFGRX: RGACX (250) vs CFGRX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.96 vs. CFGRX (11.84). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.89 vs. CFGRX (27.58).
| CFGRX | RGACX | CFGRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.94 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.94 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.133 | 14.113 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 251M | 325B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 0.07 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.84 | 18.96 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.52 | 41.55 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.58 | 41.89 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.55 | 84.41 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement