Ad is loading...
CFGRX vs RGACX
CFGRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CFGRX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$67.33
Change-$2.51 (-3.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.57B
CFGRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFGRX vs. RGACX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFGRX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 287B vs. CFGRX (230M). CFGRX pays higher dividends than RGACX: CFGRX (0.10) vs RGACX (0.08). CFGRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CFGRX (30 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CFGRX (0.74). CFGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFGRX: RGACX (250) vs CFGRX (1000). CFGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.66 vs. RGACX (2.66). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 47.01 vs. CFGRX (35.62).
| CFGRX | RGACX | CFGRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.94 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.94 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.257 | -2.987 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 230M | 287B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 0.08 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.66 | 2.66 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.52 | 21.08 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.62 | 47.01 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.69 | 63.74 | 122% |