Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFGRX vs RGACX
CFGRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CFGRX vs RGACX
CFGRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFGRX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFGRX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CFGRX (193M). CFGRX pays higher dividends than RGACX: CFGRX (0.09) vs RGACX (0.00). CFGRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CFGRX (32 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CFGRX (0.73). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CFGRX (30.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFGRX: RGACX (250) vs CFGRX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.86 vs. CFGRX (-3.83). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 15.76 vs. CFGRX (-0.21).
| CFGRX | RGACX | CFGRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.93 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.93 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.220 | 6.443 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 193M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.83 | 7.86 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.87 | 42.49 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.21 | 15.76 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.60 | 103.85 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers