Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFGRX vs RGAFX
CFGRX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts CFGRX vs RGAFX
CFGRX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFGRX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFGRX is a StrongBuy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CFGRX (190M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than CFGRX: RGAFX (0.46) vs CFGRX (0.09). CFGRX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: CFGRX (32 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). CFGRX (0.73) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CFGRX (30.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFGRX: RGAFX (250) vs CFGRX (1000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.44 vs. CFGRX (-6.47). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.38 vs. CFGRX (-5.24).
| CFGRX | RGAFX | CFGRX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.34 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.34 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.013 | 8.020 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 190M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 0.46 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.47 | 6.44 | -100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.61 | 45.06 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.24 | 17.38 | -30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.61 | 113.52 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement