Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFGRX vs RGAGX
CFGRX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts CFGRX vs RGAGX
CFGRX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFGRX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFGRX is a Buy and RGAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. CFGRX (187M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than CFGRX: RGAGX (0.52) vs CFGRX (0.10). CFGRX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: CFGRX (32 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). CFGRX (0.73) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CFGRX (30.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFGRX: RGAGX (250) vs CFGRX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.96 vs. CFGRX (-8.93). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.08 vs. CFGRX (-6.86).
| CFGRX | RGAGX | CFGRX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.29 | 252% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.29 | 252% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.096 | 5.796 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 187M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 0.52 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.93 | 1.96 | -456% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.92 | 37.42 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.86 | 15.08 | -45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.92 | 103.10 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement