Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFIAX vs RLBFX
CFIAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CFIAX vs RLBFX
CFIAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFIAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFIAX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. CFIAX (1.34B). CFIAX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: CFIAX (4.17) vs RLBFX (2.03). CFIAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CFIAX (15 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). CFIAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. CFIAX (43.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFIAX: RLBFX (250) vs CFIAX (2000). CFIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.86 vs. RLBFX (6.98). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. CFIAX (29.59).
| CFIAX | RLBFX | CFIAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.30 | 400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.30 | 400% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.510 | 8.705 | 121% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 285B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.17 | 2.03 | 205% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.86 | 6.98 | 184% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.59 | 42.70 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.59 | 33.18 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.25 | 87.98 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement