Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFIAX vs RLBFX
CFIAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CFIAX vs RLBFX
CFIAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFIAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFIAX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. CFIAX (1.34B). CFIAX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: CFIAX (4.12) vs RLBFX (2.02). CFIAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CFIAX (15 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). CFIAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). CFIAX (50.00) and RLBFX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFIAX: RLBFX (250) vs CFIAX (2000). CFIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.20 vs. RLBFX (17.28). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.48 vs. CFIAX (31.27).
| CFIAX | RLBFX | CFIAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.30 | 370% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.30 | 370% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.236 | 9.885 | 104% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 288B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.12 | 2.02 | 205% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.20 | 17.28 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.77 | 37.83 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.27 | 39.48 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.38 | 92.04 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers