CFIC
Price
$6.72
Change
-$0.39 (-5.49%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
7.75M
CHBAF
Price
$8.01
Change
-$0.49 (-5.76%)
Updated
Nov 8 closing price
Capitalization
5.14B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFIC vs CHBAF

Header iconCFIC vs CHBAF Comparison
Open Charts CFIC vs CHBAFBanner chart's image
Cornerstone Financial Corp. (NJ)
Price$6.72
Change-$0.39 (-5.49%)
Volume$4.86K
Capitalization7.75M
Chiba Bank, Ltd. (The)
Price$8.01
Change-$0.49 (-5.76%)
Volume$112
Capitalization5.14B
CFIC vs CHBAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFIC vs. CHBAF commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFIC is a Hold and CHBAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CFIC: $6.72 vs. CHBAF: $8.01)
Brand notoriety: CFIC and CHBAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFIC: 100% vs. CHBAF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CFIC: $7.75M vs. CHBAF: $5.14B
CFIC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $7.75M. CHBAF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFIC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCHBAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFIC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CHBAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHBAF is a better buy in the long-term than CFIC.

Price Growth

CFIC (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CHBAF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.43%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHBAF($5.14B) has a higher market cap than CFIC($7.75M). CFIC (0.000) and CHBAF (0.000) have similar YTD gains . CFIC has less debt than CHBAF: CFIC (18M) vs CHBAF (2.14T). CHBAF has higher revenues than CFIC: CHBAF (224B) vs CFIC (14.4M).
CFICCHBAFCFIC / CHBAF
Capitalization7.75M5.14B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.0000.000-
P/E RatioN/A10.37-
Revenue14.4M224B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt18M2.14T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFIC vs CHBAF: Fundamental Ratings
CFIC
CHBAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5041
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10036
SMR RATING
1..100
751
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7272
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10043
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFIC's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as CHBAF (30). This means that CFIC’s stock grew similarly to CHBAF’s over the last 12 months.

CHBAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFIC (100). This means that CHBAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFIC’s over the last 12 months.

CHBAF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CFIC (75). This means that CHBAF’s stock grew significantly faster than CFIC’s over the last 12 months.

CHBAF's Price Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as CFIC (72). This means that CHBAF’s stock grew similarly to CFIC’s over the last 12 months.

CHBAF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFIC (100). This means that CHBAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFIC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALOIX34.27N/A
N/A
Virtus International S/C Instl
HBMCX26.55N/A
N/A
Hartford MidCap HLS IB
VRTIX322.56N/A
N/A
Vanguard Russell 2000 Index I
FIKYX13.37N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% Z
JICAX76.84N/A
N/A
JPMorgan US Sustainable Leaders A

CFIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFIC and MZTFF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFIC and MZTFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFIC
1D Price
Change %
CFIC100%
N/A
MZTFF - CFIC
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGTFY - CFIC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELMA - CFIC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WVFC - CFIC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBAF - CFIC
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CHBAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHBAF and BKHPF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHBAF and BKHPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHBAF
1D Price
Change %
CHBAF100%
N/A
BKHPF - CHBAF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EFSI - CHBAF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
DBSDF - CHBAF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
CCRDF - CHBAF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLQC - CHBAF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More