Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFIHX vs TAGBX
CFIHX vs TAGBX Comparison
Open Charts CFIHX vs TAGBX
CFIHX vs TAGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFIHX vs. TAGBX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFIHX is a Hold and TAGBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFIHX has more cash in the bank: 130B vs. TAGBX (346M). TAGBX pays higher dividends than CFIHX: TAGBX (5.32) vs CFIHX (2.97). CFIHX was incepted earlier than TAGBX: CFIHX (10 years) vs TAGBX (15 years). TAGBX (1.26) is less costly to investors than CFIHX (0.26). TAGBX (50.24) and CFIHX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. TAGBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFIHX: TAGBX (1000) vs CFIHX (1000000). TAGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.27 vs. CFIHX (12.18). CFIHX (43.76) and TAGBX (41.76) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CFIHX | TAGBX | CFIHX / TAGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.26 | 1.21 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.26 | 1.26 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.740 | 16.179 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 130B | 346M | 37,572% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 5.32 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.18 | 26.27 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.52 | 61.46 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.76 | 41.76 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 59.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement