Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFIHX vs WMMRX
CFIHX vs WMMRX Comparison
Open Charts CFIHX vs WMMRX
CFIHX vs WMMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFIHX vs. WMMRX commentary
Sep 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFIHX is a Hold and WMMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFIHX has more cash in the bank: 130B vs. WMMRX (471M). WMMRX pays higher dividends than CFIHX: WMMRX (6.07) vs CFIHX (2.97). CFIHX was incepted earlier than WMMRX: CFIHX (10 years) vs WMMRX (21 years). WMMRX (1.37) is less costly to investors than CFIHX (0.26). CFIHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WMMRX (7.00). WMMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFIHX: WMMRX (1000) vs CFIHX (1000000). WMMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.56 vs. CFIHX (11.30). CFIHX return over 5 years is better than : 41.39 vs. WMMRX (33.07).
| CFIHX | WMMRX | CFIHX / WMMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.26 | 1.00 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.26 | 1.37 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.291 | 18.555 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 25 | - |
| Net Assets | 130B | 471M | 27,601% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 6.07 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.30 | 22.56 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.75 | 41.47 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.39 | 33.07 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 74.66 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers