Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFIPX vs CWGFX
CFIPX vs CWGFX Comparison
Open Charts CFIPX vs CWGFX
CFIPX vs CWGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFIPX vs. CWGFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFIPX is a Buy and CWGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. CFIPX (676M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than CFIPX: CWGFX (1.29) vs CFIPX (0.44). CFIPX was incepted earlier than CWGFX: CFIPX (36 years) vs CWGFX (26 years). CFIPX (1.22) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CFIPX (31.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFIPX: CWGFX (250) vs CFIPX (1000). CFIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.17 vs. CWGFX (11.47). CFIPX return over 5 years is better than : 55.10 vs. CWGFX (32.66).
| CFIPX | CWGFX | CFIPX / CWGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.79 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.79 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.719 | 15.977 | 86% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 676M | 158B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 1.29 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.17 | 11.47 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.91 | 51.55 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.10 | 32.66 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.20 | 97.07 | 159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers