Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFIPX vs CWGFX
CFIPX vs CWGFX Comparison
Open Charts CFIPX vs CWGFX
CFIPX vs CWGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFIPX vs. CWGFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFIPX is a StrongBuy and CWGFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. CFIPX (683M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than CFIPX: CWGFX (1.31) vs CFIPX (0.46). CFIPX was incepted earlier than CWGFX: CFIPX (36 years) vs CWGFX (25 years). CFIPX (1.22) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CFIPX (31.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFIPX: CWGFX (250) vs CFIPX (1000). CFIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.50 vs. CWGFX (17.16). CFIPX return over 5 years is better than : 58.70 vs. CWGFX (36.91).
| CFIPX | CWGFX | CFIPX / CWGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.79 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.79 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.066 | 16.994 | 89% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 683M | 156B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 1.31 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.50 | 17.16 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.77 | 54.63 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.70 | 36.91 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.32 | 94.42 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers