Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFLGX vs RMEBX
CFLGX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CFLGX vs RMEBX
CFLGX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFLGX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFLGX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CFLGX (363M). CFLGX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CFLGX (2.79) vs RMEBX (0.99). CFLGX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CFLGX (36 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). CFLGX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). CFLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFLGX: RMEBX (250) vs CFLGX (1000). CFLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.63 vs. RMEBX (4.65). CFLGX return over 5 years is better than : 54.48 vs. RMEBX (34.68).
| CFLGX | RMEBX | CFLGX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.07 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.07 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.946 | 8.448 | 118% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 363M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 0.99 | 282% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.63 | 4.65 | 207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.47 | 34.88 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.48 | 34.68 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.54 | 92.45 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers