Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFLGX vs RMEBX
CFLGX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CFLGX vs RMEBX
CFLGX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFLGX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFLGX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. CFLGX (366M). CFLGX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CFLGX (2.85) vs RMEBX (1.04). CFLGX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CFLGX (36 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). CFLGX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). CFLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFLGX: RMEBX (250) vs CFLGX (1000). CFLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.00 vs. RMEBX (9.98). CFLGX return over 5 years is better than : 56.18 vs. RMEBX (32.93).
| CFLGX | RMEBX | CFLGX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.07 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.07 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.064 | 5.801 | 139% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 366M | 115B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.85 | 1.04 | 275% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.00 | 9.98 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.95 | 34.14 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.18 | 32.93 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.94 | 89.84 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement