Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFLGX vs RMFCX
CFLGX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CFLGX vs RMFCX
CFLGX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFLGX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFLGX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CFLGX (371M). CFLGX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: CFLGX (2.83) vs RMFCX (1.15). CFLGX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CFLGX (36 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). CFLGX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CFLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFLGX: RMFCX (250) vs CFLGX (1000). CFLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.37 vs. RMFCX (9.14). CFLGX return over 5 years is better than : 58.06 vs. RMFCX (36.70).
| CFLGX | RMFCX | CFLGX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.91 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.91 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.792 | 10.454 | 113% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 371M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 1.15 | 246% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.37 | 9.14 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.02 | 38.82 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.06 | 36.70 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.05 | 92.27 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement