Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFLGX vs RMFCX
CFLGX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CFLGX vs RMFCX
CFLGX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFLGX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFLGX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. CFLGX (366M). CFLGX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: CFLGX (2.85) vs RMFCX (1.19). CFLGX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CFLGX (36 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). CFLGX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CFLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFLGX: RMFCX (250) vs CFLGX (1000). CFLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.00 vs. RMFCX (10.10). CFLGX return over 5 years is better than : 56.18 vs. RMFCX (33.85).
| CFLGX | RMFCX | CFLGX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.91 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.91 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.064 | 5.845 | 138% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 366M | 115B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.85 | 1.19 | 240% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.00 | 10.10 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.95 | 34.65 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.18 | 33.85 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.94 | 91.46 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement