Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFLGX vs RMFEX
CFLGX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts CFLGX vs RMFEX
CFLGX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFLGX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFLGX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. CFLGX (366M). CFLGX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: CFLGX (2.85) vs RMFEX (1.45). CFLGX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: CFLGX (36 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). CFLGX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). CFLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFLGX: RMFEX (250) vs CFLGX (1000). CFLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.00 vs. RMFEX (10.46). CFLGX return over 5 years is better than : 56.18 vs. RMFEX (35.97).
| CFLGX | RMFEX | CFLGX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.62 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.62 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.064 | 5.987 | 135% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 366M | 115B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.85 | 1.45 | 197% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.00 | 10.46 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.95 | 35.96 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.18 | 35.97 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.94 | 99.50 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement