CFLT
Price
$22.76
Change
-$0.03 (-0.13%)
Updated
Oct 15 closing price
Capitalization
7.85B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
COMP
Price
$7.29
Change
+$0.10 (+1.39%)
Updated
Oct 15 closing price
Capitalization
4.06B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFLT vs COMP

Header iconCFLT vs COMP Comparison
Open Charts CFLT vs COMPBanner chart's image
Confluent
Price$22.76
Change-$0.03 (-0.13%)
Volume$5.54M
Capitalization7.85B
Compass
Price$7.29
Change+$0.10 (+1.39%)
Volume$15.79M
Capitalization4.06B
CFLT vs COMP Comparison Chart in %
CFLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
COMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFLT vs. COMP commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFLT is a Hold and COMP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (CFLT: $22.76 vs. COMP: $7.29)
Brand notoriety: CFLT and COMP are both not notable
CFLT represents the Computer Communications, while COMP is part of the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFLT: 66% vs. COMP: 147%
Market capitalization -- CFLT: $7.85B vs. COMP: $4.06B
CFLT [@Computer Communications] is valued at $7.85B. COMP’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $4.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.53B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFLT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCOMP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFLT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • COMP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFLT is a better buy in the long-term than COMP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFLT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while COMP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFLT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • COMP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFLT is a better buy in the short-term than COMP.

Price Growth

CFLT (@Computer Communications) experienced а +2.06% price change this week, while COMP (@Real Estate Development) price change was -0.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.92%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFLT is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

COMP is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (-0.22% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Real Estate Development (+0.12% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFLT($7.85B) has a higher market cap than COMP($4.06B). COMP YTD gains are higher at: 24.615 vs. CFLT (-18.598). COMP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 46.5M vs. CFLT (-371.18M). CFLT has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. COMP (177M). COMP has less debt than CFLT: COMP (547M) vs CFLT (1.11B). COMP has higher revenues than CFLT: COMP (6.29B) vs CFLT (1.07B).
CFLTCOMPCFLT / COMP
Capitalization7.85B4.06B193%
EBITDA-371.18M46.5M-798%
Gain YTD-18.59824.615-76%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.07B6.29B17%
Total Cash1.94B177M1,097%
Total Debt1.11B547M203%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFLTCOMP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
COMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TGVIX33.850.41
+1.23%
Thornburg International Equity I
RIBEX66.620.24
+0.36%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer R2E
BRWVX28.99N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Growth Eq R6
WFATX41.76N/A
N/A
Allspring Index Asset Allocation Instl
VYMVX18.63N/A
N/A
Voya MI Dynamic SMID Cap R

CFLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFLT has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFLT jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFLT
1D Price
Change %
CFLT100%
-0.13%
COIN - CFLT
71%
Closely correlated
-1.54%
CLSK - CFLT
66%
Loosely correlated
+5.55%
RIOT - CFLT
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
SPSC - CFLT
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
DDOG - CFLT
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
More

COMP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COMP has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COMP jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COMP
1D Price
Change %
COMP100%
+1.39%
COIN - COMP
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.54%
AFRM - COMP
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
U - COMP
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.27%
CLSK - COMP
59%
Loosely correlated
+5.55%
TDOC - COMP
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
More