Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs CMBFX
CFMOX vs CMBFX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs CMBFX
CFMOX vs CMBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. CMBFX commentary
Jun 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and CMBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 293M vs. CFMOX (211M). CFMOX (2.61) and CMBFX (2.49) have matching dividends . CFMOX was incepted earlier than CMBFX: CFMOX (31 years) vs CMBFX (42 years). CFMOX (0.69) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). CFMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. CMBFX (12.00). CFMOX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: CFMOX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CFMOX (5.48) and CMBFX (5.32) have marching annual gain over last year. CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 3.70 vs. CFMOX (3.16).
| CFMOX | CMBFX | CFMOX / CMBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.59 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.60 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.774 | 1.039 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 211M | 293M | 72% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.61 | 2.49 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.48 | 5.32 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.46 | 9.64 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.16 | 3.70 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.16 | 14.65 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement