Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs ETNCX
CFMOX vs ETNCX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs ETNCX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.67
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets233.38M
Eaton Vance NC Municipal Income A
Price$8.40
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets239.41M
CFMOX vs ETNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. ETNCX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and ETNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ETNCX (239M) and CFMOX (233M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . ETNCX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: ETNCX (2.98) vs CFMOX (2.53). CFMOX was incepted earlier than ETNCX: CFMOX (31 years) vs ETNCX (32 years). CFMOX (0.70) and ETNCX (0.70) have similar cost to investors . ETNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX (1000) and ETNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CFMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.82 vs. ETNCX (2.08). CFMOX return over 5 years is better than : 2.46 vs. ETNCX (1.12).
| CFMOX | ETNCX | CFMOX / ETNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.70 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.70 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.152 | 2.472 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 233M | 239M | 97% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 2.98 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.82 | 2.08 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.12 | 11.37 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.46 | 1.12 | 219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.46 | 3.58 | 460% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement