Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs UTAHX
CFMOX vs UTAHX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs UTAHX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.70
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets233.47M
NYLI MacKay Utah Muni
Price$9.66
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets190.82M
CFMOX vs UTAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. UTAHX commentary
Oct 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and UTAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 233M vs. UTAHX (191M). UTAHX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: UTAHX (3.52) vs CFMOX (2.53). CFMOX was incepted earlier than UTAHX: CFMOX (31 years) vs UTAHX (33 years). UTAHX (0.96) is less costly to investors than CFMOX (0.70). UTAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX (1000) and UTAHX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. UTAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.29 vs. CFMOX (2.76). CFMOX return over 5 years is better than : 2.56 vs. UTAHX (2.16).
| CFMOX | UTAHX | CFMOX / UTAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.90 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.96 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.207 | 3.553 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 233M | 191M | 122% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 3.52 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.76 | 3.29 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.18 | 11.66 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.56 | 2.16 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.53 | 17.24 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers