Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs UTAHX
CFMOX vs UTAHX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs UTAHX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.79M
NYLI MacKay Utah Muni
Price$9.67
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets194.43M
CFMOX vs UTAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. UTAHX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and UTAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 235M vs. UTAHX (194M). UTAHX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: UTAHX (3.51) vs CFMOX (2.54). CFMOX was incepted earlier than UTAHX: CFMOX (31 years) vs UTAHX (33 years). UTAHX (0.96) is less costly to investors than CFMOX (0.70). UTAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX (1000) and UTAHX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. UTAHX (3.64) and CFMOX (3.50) have marching annual gain over last year. CFMOX return over 5 years is better than : 2.72 vs. UTAHX (1.84).
| CFMOX | UTAHX | CFMOX / UTAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.90 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.96 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.930 | 3.986 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 235M | 194M | 121% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.54 | 3.51 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.50 | 3.64 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.73 | 10.16 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.72 | 1.84 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.40 | 17.73 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers