Ad is loading...
CFMOX vs UTAHX
CFMOX vs UTAHX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs UTAHX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.14
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets229.25M
NYLI MacKay Utah Muni
Price$9.39
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.52M
CFMOX vs UTAHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. UTAHX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and UTAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 229M vs. UTAHX (199M). UTAHX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: UTAHX (3.12) vs CFMOX (2.41). CFMOX was incepted earlier than UTAHX: CFMOX (30 years) vs UTAHX (33 years). UTAHX (0.96) is less costly to investors than CFMOX (0.70). UTAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX (1000) and UTAHX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. UTAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.98 vs. CFMOX (0.91). UTAHX return over 5 years is better than : 0.89 vs. CFMOX (0.31).
| CFMOX | UTAHX | CFMOX / UTAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.90 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.96 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.165 | -1.146 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 199M | 115% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.41 | 3.12 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.91 | 0.98 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.75 | 4.17 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.31 | 0.89 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.71 | 12.03 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...