Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs UTAHX
CFMOX vs UTAHX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs UTAHX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.29
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets228.76M
NYLI MacKay Utah Muni
Price$9.44
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets185.69M
CFMOX vs UTAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. UTAHX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and UTAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 229M vs. UTAHX (186M). UTAHX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: UTAHX (3.54) vs CFMOX (2.53). CFMOX was incepted earlier than UTAHX: CFMOX (30 years) vs UTAHX (33 years). UTAHX (0.96) is less costly to investors than CFMOX (0.70). UTAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX (1000) and UTAHX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CFMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.05 vs. UTAHX (0.98). CFMOX return over 5 years is better than : -1.09 vs. UTAHX (-1.67).
| CFMOX | UTAHX | CFMOX / UTAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.90 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.96 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.713 | 0.570 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 186M | 123% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 3.54 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.05 | 0.98 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.32 | 3.74 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.09 | -1.67 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.06 | 14.30 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers