Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs UTAHX
CFMOX vs UTAHX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs UTAHX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.62
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets230.13M
NYLI MacKay Utah Muni
Price$9.61
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets189.14M
CFMOX vs UTAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. UTAHX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and UTAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 230M vs. UTAHX (189M). UTAHX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: UTAHX (3.54) vs CFMOX (2.54). CFMOX was incepted earlier than UTAHX: CFMOX (31 years) vs UTAHX (33 years). UTAHX (0.96) is less costly to investors than CFMOX (0.70). UTAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX (1000) and UTAHX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. UTAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.20 vs. CFMOX (1.86). CFMOX return over 5 years is better than : 1.45 vs. UTAHX (1.10).
| CFMOX | UTAHX | CFMOX / UTAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.90 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.96 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.591 | 2.704 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 230M | 189M | 122% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.54 | 3.54 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.86 | 2.20 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.97 | 9.31 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.45 | 1.10 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.25 | 16.84 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement