Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs UTAHX
CFMOX vs UTAHX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs UTAHX
CFMOX vs UTAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. UTAHX commentary
Jun 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and UTAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 211M vs. UTAHX (199M). UTAHX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: UTAHX (3.59) vs CFMOX (2.61). CFMOX was incepted earlier than UTAHX: CFMOX (31 years) vs UTAHX (34 years). UTAHX (0.78) is less costly to investors than CFMOX (0.69). UTAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. CFMOX (13.00). CFMOX (1000) and UTAHX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. UTAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.78 vs. CFMOX (5.48). UTAHX return over 5 years is better than : 3.32 vs. CFMOX (3.16).
| CFMOX | UTAHX | CFMOX / UTAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.78 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.78 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.774 | 1.817 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 211M | 199M | 106% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.61 | 3.59 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.48 | 6.78 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.46 | 10.90 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.16 | 3.32 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.16 | 16.66 | 91% |