Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFNLX vs FLTMX
CFNLX vs FLTMX Comparison
Open Charts CFNLX vs FLTMX
CFNLX vs FLTMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFNLX vs. FLTMX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFNLX is a Hold and FLTMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLTMX has more cash in the bank: 13.9B vs. CFNLX (290M). FLTMX (2.98) and CFNLX (2.86) have matching dividends . CFNLX was incepted earlier than FLTMX: CFNLX (32 years) vs FLTMX (49 years). CFNLX (0.57) is less costly to investors than FLTMX (0.39). CFNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FLTMX (15.00). FLTMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFNLX: FLTMX (0) vs CFNLX (1000). FLTMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.34 vs. CFNLX (-0.65). FLTMX return over 5 years is better than : 3.15 vs. CFNLX (-0.55).
| CFNLX | FLTMX | CFNLX / FLTMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.37 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.39 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 49 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.336 | -1.778 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 290M | 13.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.86 | 2.98 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.65 | -0.34 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.47 | 9.02 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.55 | 3.15 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.03 | 18.41 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement