Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFNLX vs FLTMX
CFNLX vs FLTMX Comparison
Open Charts CFNLX vs FLTMX
CFNLX vs FLTMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFNLX vs. FLTMX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFNLX is a Hold and FLTMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLTMX has more cash in the bank: 13.9B vs. CFNLX (349M). FLTMX (2.88) and CFNLX (2.77) have matching dividends . CFNLX was incepted earlier than FLTMX: CFNLX (31 years) vs FLTMX (49 years). CFNLX (0.62) is less costly to investors than FLTMX (0.39). CFNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FLTMX (15.00). FLTMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFNLX: FLTMX (0) vs CFNLX (1000). CFNLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.48 vs. FLTMX (6.15). FLTMX return over 5 years is better than : 6.35 vs. CFNLX (3.35).
| CFNLX | FLTMX | CFNLX / FLTMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.37 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.39 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 49 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.118 | 0.912 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 349M | 13.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.77 | 2.88 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.48 | 6.15 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.13 | 11.57 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.35 | 6.35 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.80 | 22.76 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement