Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFNLX vs NMBAX
CFNLX vs NMBAX Comparison
Open Charts CFNLX vs NMBAX
CFNLX vs NMBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFNLX vs. NMBAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFNLX is a Hold and NMBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMBAX has more cash in the bank: 9.3B vs. CFNLX (290M). NMBAX pays higher dividends than CFNLX: NMBAX (3.27) vs CFNLX (2.86). CFNLX was incepted earlier than NMBAX: CFNLX (32 years) vs NMBAX (31 years). NMBAX (0.63) is less costly to investors than CFNLX (0.57). CFNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. NMBAX (24.00). CFNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMBAX: CFNLX (1000) vs NMBAX (2500). NMBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.47 vs. CFNLX (-0.65). NMBAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.02 vs. CFNLX (-0.55).
| CFNLX | NMBAX | CFNLX / NMBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.63 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.63 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.336 | -1.985 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 290M | 9.3B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.86 | 3.27 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.65 | -0.47 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.47 | 8.73 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.55 | 1.02 | -54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.03 | 13.71 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement