Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFSIX vs RGACX
CFSIX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CFSIX vs RGACX
CFSIX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFSIX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFSIX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CFSIX (2.07B). CFSIX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CFSIX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CFSIX (22 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) and CFSIX (0.90) have similar cost to investors . CFSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFSIX: RGACX (250) vs CFSIX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.46 vs. CFSIX (2.53). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 15.43 vs. CFSIX (-3.11).
| CFSIX | RGACX | CFSIX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.93 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.93 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.506 | 6.146 | -25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.53 | 7.46 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.73 | 43.37 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.11 | 15.43 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.97 | 102.78 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers