Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFSMX vs MVCAX
CFSMX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts CFSMX vs MVCAX
CFSMX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFSMX vs. MVCAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFSMX is a Hold and MVCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17.7B vs. CFSMX (305M). MVCAX pays higher dividends than CFSMX: MVCAX (1.09) vs CFSMX (0.43). CFSMX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: CFSMX (11 years) vs MVCAX (25 years). MVCAX (0.98) is less costly to investors than CFSMX (0.89). CFSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. MVCAX (24.00). MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFSMX: MVCAX (1000) vs CFSMX (100000000). MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.14 vs. CFSMX (6.40). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 20.74 vs. CFSMX (-8.57).
| CFSMX | MVCAX | CFSMX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.97 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.98 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.983 | 17.692 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 1000 | 10,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305M | 17.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 1.09 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.40 | 13.14 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.48 | 29.68 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.57 | 20.74 | -41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.53 | 86.14 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement