Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFSMX vs MVCAX
CFSMX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts CFSMX vs MVCAX
CFSMX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFSMX vs. MVCAX commentary
Jul 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFSMX is a StrongBuy and MVCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17.4B vs. CFSMX (303M). MVCAX pays higher dividends than CFSMX: MVCAX (1.11) vs CFSMX (0.46). CFSMX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: CFSMX (11 years) vs MVCAX (25 years). MVCAX (0.98) is less costly to investors than CFSMX (0.89). CFSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. MVCAX (24.00). MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFSMX: MVCAX (1000) vs CFSMX (100000000). MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.05 vs. CFSMX (3.83). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.59 vs. CFSMX (-16.89).
| CFSMX | MVCAX | CFSMX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.97 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.98 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.955 | 13.535 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 1000 | 10,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 303M | 17.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 1.11 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.83 | 10.05 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.62 | 22.83 | -11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.89 | 16.59 | -102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.34 | 85.97 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement